White v. White, et al.
Plaintiff: DAVID WHITE
Defendant: TAMERA DAVIS, JULIA ANNETTE WHITE, DAVID SMITH and JAMES SHIPLEY
Case Number: 24-6799
Filed: November 7, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2025 Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 9) filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 01/03/2025 12:46 AM]
December 28, 2024 Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 9) filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 12/28/2024 06:29 PM]
December 12, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 12/12/2024 10:45 PM]
December 2, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 12/02/2024 11:28 AM]
November 15, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 11/15/2024 03:04 PM]
November 15, 2024 Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant David White. [Entered: 11/15/2024 12:34 PM]
November 14, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 11/14/2024 08:56 AM]
November 14, 2024 Filing 4 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 3) filed by Appellant David White. [Entered: 11/14/2024 07:16 AM]
November 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $605.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $605.00 was paid. If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 11/13/2024 09:31 AM]
November 7, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/17/2024. For appeal no. 24-6799, 3:24-cv-01702-AR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/07/2024 05:04 PM]
November 7, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-01702-AR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6799 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/07/2024 05:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: White v. White, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAMERA DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JULIA ANNETTE WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES SHIPLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID WHITE
Represented By: David White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?