Mitchell, et al. v. Chawla, et al.
Plaintiff: ERNEST KRAUSE, ATTORNEY and FREDERICK MITCHELL
Defendant: LEAH WILSON, Executive Director of State Bar of CA, TIFFANY F. SORENSEN, Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA, GEORGE S. CARDONA, Chief Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA, MICHAEL NGUYEN, Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA, WILLIAM R. MARONI, LAWRENCE T. RING, KEITH M. BANKS, ALEX J. HACKERT, MANJARI CHAWLA, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, RYAN T. CHIN, Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA, RUBEN DURAN, Chair of the Board of Trustees of State Bar of CA and DAWN WIGERI VAN EDEMA
Case Number: 24-6827
Filed: November 12, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Frederick Mitchell. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile motion in DE 7.] [Entered: 12/30/2024 09:28 AM]
December 30, 2024 Filing 7 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Frederick Mitchell. [COURT UPDATE: Removed Motion from certificate and refiled in DE 8.] [Entered: 12/30/2024 12:07 AM] [Edited: 12/30/2024 09:29 AM]
December 27, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Frederick Mitchell. --[COURT UPDATE: Locked PDF (contains financial information).] [Entered: 12/27/2024 10:06 AM] [Edited: 12/30/2024 04:01 PM]
December 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. A review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must pay to the district court the $605.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will stay the briefing schedule. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. [Entered: 12/06/2024 04:44 PM]
December 2, 2024 Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Frederick Mitchell. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 12/02/2024 02:29 PM]
November 26, 2024 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/2/2024. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 11/26/2024 12:43 PM]
November 12, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/18/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/20/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/20/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/29/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/28/2025. For appeal no. 24-6827, 2:23-cv-02307-DAD-SCR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/12/2024 01:23 PM]
November 12, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-02307-DAD-SCR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6827 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/12/2024 01:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mitchell, et al. v. Chawla, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEAH WILSON, Executive Director of State Bar of CA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIFFANY F. SORENSEN, Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE S. CARDONA, Chief Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL NGUYEN, Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM R. MARONI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAWRENCE T. RING
Represented By: Lawrence T. Ring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEITH M. BANKS
Represented By: Jason Jerrold Sommer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEX J. HACKERT
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MANJARI CHAWLA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN T. CHIN, Trial Counsel of State Bar of CA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RUBEN DURAN, Chair of the Board of Trustees of State Bar of CA
Represented By: Anik Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAWN WIGERI VAN EDEMA
Represented By: Jason Jerrold Sommer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERNEST KRAUSE, ATTORNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FREDERICK MITCHELL
Represented By: Ernest Krause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?