Shorter v. State of California, et al.
| LECIA L. SHORTER |
| TAYLOR PRESTON, an individual, CALIFORNIA CREDIT UNION, JOVITA RAQUEL SILVERA, an individual, COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and its Governmental Branches, DAVID S. WESLEY, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, a public corporation, DOES, 1 thru 10 inclusive, FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC, also known as Fidelity Investments, FRED MESSERER, an individual, GINA CLARK KEAVENY, CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL COUNCIL, PATRICIA TITUS, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge, CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DANIEL WINSTON STEWART, NICHOLAS THALER, MONIQUE SHERRI ALLEN, an individual, SOPHIA PRESTON, an individual, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, JONATHON ROSENBLOOM, SMBC MANUBANK, also known as Manufacturers Bank and SHERYL HAYASHIDA, an individual |
| 24-6869 |
| November 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Jay S. BYBEE, Daniel P. COLLINS [Entered: 12/13/2024 08:04 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Jay S. BYBEE, Daniel P. COLLINS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/21/2024 03:30 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/23/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/22/2025. For appeal no. 24-6869, 2:24-cv-02799-DOC-BFM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/13/2024 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-02799-DOC-BFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6869 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/13/2024 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
