Eteghaei, et al. v. Farruggia, et al.
ARASH ETEGHAEI and MITRA ZADE |
Lt MATTHEW FARRUGGIA, Ofr. JOSHUA ARMILLO, DOES 1-50, Ofr. RILEY WALTER, GREGORY JO AHERN, Ofr. AVILA, Ofr. JOSHUA DORMER, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, G. LEVETTE, Sgt., Sheriff YESENIA SANCHEZ, Det. A. MATEEN, Ofr. SCOTT BRANDON, Ofr. M. MONCADA, Ofr. SAMANIEGO, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA and COUNTY OF ALAMEDA |
24-6927 |
November 15, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [24-7290, 24-6927] [Entered: 12/13/2024 02:42 PM] |
Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): In Appeal No. 24-7290:. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [24-7290, 24-6927] [Entered: 12/12/2024 01:31 PM] |
Filing 12 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Eteghaei and Zade) 12/9/2024, Cross Appeal First Brief Due (Appellant) 2/4/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due (Appellee) 3/6/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due (Appellant) 4/7/2025. For appeal no. 24-6927, 24-7290, 4:22-cv-04298-KAW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [24-6927, 24-7290] [Entered: 12/03/2024 05:11 PM] |
Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Case Nos. 24-6927 and 24-7168 were opened as cross appeals in error. The cross appeal schedule is vacated and these cases will proceed separately. The briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [24-6927, 24-7168] [Entered: 12/03/2024 11:41 AM] |
Filing 10 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 12/02/2024 10:58 AM] |
Filing 9 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [24-6927, 24-7168] [Entered: 11/27/2024 01:06 PM] |
Filing 8 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/2/2024, Cross Appeal First Brief Due 2/4/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due 3/6/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due 4/7/2025. For appeal no. 24-6927, 4:22-cv-04298-KAW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [24-7168, 24-6927] [Entered: 11/27/2024 11:48 AM] |
Filing 7 District Court Order/Notice Received. [Entered: 11/26/2024 10:39 AM] |
Filing 6 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 11/25/2024 09:13 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER: By 11/26/2024, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 11/20/2024 02:31 PM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Matthew Farruggia, Appellant Riley Walter, Appellant Joshua Dormer. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/19/2024 10:29 AM] |
Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/20/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/26/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/26/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/4/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/6/2025. For appeal no. 24-6927, 4:22-cv-04298-KAW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/15/2024 11:29 AM] |
Filing 2 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Christopher E. Brumfiel, Counsel for Appellant Temitayo Peters Court Update: added counsel to case [Entered: 11/15/2024 11:27 AM] |
Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:22-cv-04298-KAW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6927 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/15/2024 11:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.