Marshall v. Tailored Shared Services, LLC, et al.
| DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive |
| THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, LLC, a limited liability company and TAILORED SHARED SERVICES, LLC, a limited liability company |
| MELISSA MARSHALL, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated |
| 24-6950 |
| November 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Richard C. TALLMAN) The petition for permission to appeal is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 1453(c); Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 627 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 2010) (describing factors this court considers in analyzing a CAFA petition). [Entered: 12/20/2024 06:02 PM]
|
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 11/15/2024 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/15/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6950 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 11/15/2024 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1453(c) filed by Petitioner Tailored Shared Services, LLC, Petitioner The Men's Wearhouse, LLC. [Entered: 11/15/2024 04:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marshall v. Tailored Shared Services, LLC, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, LLC, a limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Cory D. Catignani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TAILORED SHARED SERVICES, LLC, a limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Cory D. Catignani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MELISSA MARSHALL, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Arash Sadat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
