Fayed v. Allison, et al.
Plaintiff: JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Defendant: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, RON DAVIS, San Quentin State Prison Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Case Number: 24-7047
Filed: November 21, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2024 Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 12) filed by Appellee Ron Davis. [Entered: 12/26/2024 11:18 AM]
December 23, 2024 Filing 15 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Appellant James Michael Fayed is filed. Original and 3 copies. (Briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 12/24/2024 08:18 AM]
December 23, 2024 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James Michael Fayed. [Entered: 12/24/2024 08:16 AM]
December 16, 2024 Filing 11 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 12/10/2024. [Entered: 12/16/2024 09:22 AM]
December 13, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant James Michael Fayed. [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:37 PM]
December 13, 2024 Filing 12 RESPONSE to Court Order filed by Appellant James Michael Fayed. [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:33 PM]
December 12, 2024 Filing 7 Attorney Neah Huynh as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Zewugeberhan Desta. [Entered: 12/12/2024 03:00 PM]
December 12, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Neah Huynh for Appellee Ron Davis replacing Zewugeberhan Desta. [Entered: 12/12/2024 01:49 PM]
December 10, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant James Michael Fayed. [Entered: 12/13/2024 10:43 AM]
December 10, 2024 Filing 9 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant James Michael Fayed. [Entered: 12/13/2024 10:37 AM]
December 10, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant James Michael Fayed. [Entered: 12/13/2024 10:19 AM]
December 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $605.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $605.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:35 PM]
December 2, 2024 Filing 4 District Court Order/Notice Received: Order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [Entered: 12/02/2024 04:04 PM]
November 26, 2024 Filing 3 REFERRAL NOTICE. This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of forma pauperis status is appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). If the district court elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the district court is requested to notify this court and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the district court does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). This referral shall not affect the briefing schedule previously established by this court. [Entered: 11/26/2024 01:05 PM]
November 21, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/31/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/30/2025. For appeal no. 24-7047, 4:21-cv-08206-JST. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/21/2024 02:20 PM]
November 21, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:21-cv-08206-JST has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7047 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/21/2024 02:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fayed v. Allison, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RON DAVIS, San Quentin State Prison Warden
Represented By: Zewugeberhan Desta
Represented By: Mr. Neah Huynh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Represented By: James Michael Fayed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?