Vitus Group, LLC, et al. v. Admiral Insurance Company, et al.
| VITUS DEVELOPMENT IV, LLC, RIVERWOOD HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, GREEN MEADOWS HOUSING MANAGEMENT, LLC, VITUS GROUP, LLC, GREEN MEADOWS HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, WESTLAKE LINWOOD HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, HOLLYWOOD SHAWNEE HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, HILTON HEAD HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES, INC., PINES HOUSING PARTNERS, LP and WESTLAKE LINWOOD HOUSING MANAGEMENT, LLC |
| ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY and JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 24-7062 |
| November 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| VITUS GROUP, LLC, ET AL. V. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Appeal No. 24-7327 is dismissed. The opening brief for appeal No. 24-7062 is due February 7, 2025. The answering brief is due March 14, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. This order serves as the mandate of the court for appeal No. 24-7327. [Entered: 01/13/2025 01:33 PM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellee Admiral Insurance Company. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry 13 in 24-7062, entry 10 in 24-7327.] [24-7062, 24-7327] [Entered: 12/26/2024 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- RESPONSE to Order - No Final Order General (DE 4) filed by Appellant Admiral Insurance Company. [WRONG FILING TYPE USED, correct entry is DE 14 in 24-7062, DE 11 in 24-7327.] [24-7327, 24-7062] [Entered: 12/26/2024 11:29 AM] [Edited: 12/26/2024 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Admiral Insurance Company. [24-7062, 24-7327] [Entered: 12/19/2024 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Admiral Insurance Company. [24-7327, 24-7062] [Entered: 12/19/2024 11:30 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) denied as unnecessary, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary because the briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of this court. [24-7062, 24-7327] [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:35 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Vitus Group, LLC, Appellant Vitus Development IV, LLC, Appellant Riverwood Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Green Meadows Housing Management, LLC, Appellant Green Meadows Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Westlake Linwood Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Westlake Linwood Housing Management, LLC, Appellant Pines Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Hilton Head Housing Partners, LP. [24-7062, 24-7327] [Entered: 12/16/2024 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Vitus Group, LLC, Appellant Vitus Development IV, LLC, Appellant Riverwood Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Green Meadows Housing Management, LLC, Appellant Green Meadows Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Westlake Linwood Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Westlake Linwood Housing Management, LLC, Appellant Pines Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Hilton Head Housing Partners, LP. [24-7062, 24-7327] [Entered: 12/16/2024 12:48 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. An order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127 (1995); see also Kircher v. Putnam Funds Tr., 547 U.S. 633, 642 (2006) (noting that 1447(d) bars review even if remand order is erroneous). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over cross-appeal No. 24-7327. Within 21 days, cross-appellant Admiral Insurance Company must either file a statement explaining why appeal No. 24-7327 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. If cross-appellant does not comply with this order, the court will dismiss appeal No. 24-7327. See Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. If cross-appellant files a statement, a response may be filed within 10 days. Briefing is stayed.[24-7327, 24-7062] [Entered: 12/06/2024 04:33 PM]
|
| Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [24-7062, 24-7327] [Entered: 12/05/2024 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/10/2024, Cross Appeal First Brief Due 1/6/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due 1/6/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due 3/10/2025. For appeal no. 24-7062, 2:24-cv-00282-RAJ. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [24-7327, 24-7062] [Entered: 12/05/2024 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/5/2024, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 11/27/2024 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Vitus Group, LLC, Appellant Vitus Development IV, LLC, Appellant Riverwood Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Green Meadows Housing Management, LLC, Appellant Green Meadows Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Westlake Linwood Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Westlake Linwood Housing Management, LLC, Appellant Pines Housing Partners, LP, Appellant Hilton Head Housing Partners, LP. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/26/2024 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/26/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/6/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/6/2025. For appeal no. 24-7062, 2:24-cv-00282-RAJ. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/21/2024 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-00282-RAJ has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7062 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/21/2024 04:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
