Snyder v. Hill, et al.
| RAYMOND MAX SNYDER |
| NEVADA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, ELKO COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE, KRISTON N. HILL, SHAY WELLS, SHAWN B. MEADOR, RYAN LISK, LAURA ANN LISK, ROBERT E. ESTES and WOODBURN & WEDGE |
| 24-7088 |
| November 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN [Entered: 01/10/2025 09:20 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this appeal No. 24-7088. DISMISSED. [Entered: 12/19/2024 04:09 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant Raymond Max Snyder. [Entered: 12/09/2024 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Appellant Raymond Max Snyder. [Entered: 12/03/2024 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Raymond Max Snyder is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 12/02/2024 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Raymond Max Snyder. [Entered: 12/02/2024 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 11/22/2024 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/7/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/7/2025. For appeal no. 24-7088, 3:24-cv-00267-MMD-CSD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-00267-MMD-CSD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7088 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
