Cherry v. Penzone, et al.
| LAQUINT HENRY LEE CHERRY |
| PAUL PENZONE, KATIE HOBBS, Paul Pensone, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF ARIZONA, Unknown DAVISON, Officer at LBJ, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Unknown MCSO Officer; named as Rose, physc associate at 4th Ave: named as Nurse Dee, Nurse at 4th Ave: named as: John Doe 1-7, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Sergeant John Doe 1-4, Unknown JACOBSON, Officer at 4th Ave, Unknown DEVINE, Named as Sergeant Divine, REDFERN, Sergeant and RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Named as AZDOCRR Director Thornell |
| 24-7121 |
| November 25, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 19) filed by Appellee Devine, Appellee Redfern. [Entered: 01/14/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 20 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 01/14/2025 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/31/2024 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 18 CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 17 by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry is filed. Original and 0 copies. (Motion to appoint counsel pending, briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 12/30/2024 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/30/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/30/2024 03:51 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 7) is unnecessary. Appellant LaQuint Henry Lee Cherry, prison identification number 310089, has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal and has completed and filed the required authorization form directing the appropriate prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the district court the filing and docketing fees for this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2). This court hereby assesses an initial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoners account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoners account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the November 21, 2024 notice of appeal. Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. The Clerk will serve this order and appellants completed authorization form on the Attorney General for the State of Arizona, who will notify the appropriate agency or prison authority responsible for calculating, collecting, and forwarding the initial payment assessed in this order and for assessing, collecting, and forwarding the remaining monthly payments of the fee to the district court for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Each payment should be accompanied by the district court and appellate docket numbers for this appeal and a record of previous payments made for this appeal. The Clerk will also serve a copy of this order on the district court Clerk and the district court financial unit. [Entered: 12/23/2024 03:33 PM]
|
| Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sean Mikel Moore [Entered: 12/18/2024 08:31 AM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sean Mikel Moore for Appellee Devine, Appellee Redfern. [Entered: 12/18/2024 08:23 AM] |
| Filing 12 ADDED Appellee Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Appellee County of Maricopa, Appellee City of Phoenix, Appellee State of Arizona, Appellee Davison, Appellee Unknown Party, Appellee Unknown Parties, Appellee Jacobson, Appellee Devine, Appellee Redfern, Appellee Ryan Thornell, Counsel for Appellee Anna Griffin Critz, Counsel for Appellee Michael E. Gottfried COURT UPDATE: added appellees and counsel to case [Entered: 12/17/2024 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 12/05/2024 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/05/2024 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 6 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 12/03/2024 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Laquint Henry Lee Cherry. [Entered: 12/03/2024 12:14 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court, and that such permission has not been revoked to date. Consequently, appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellants account. Consequently, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant must complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $605.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will send a prisoner authorization form to appellant. [Entered: 11/26/2024 01:18 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/6/2025. For appeal no. 24-7121, 2:23-cv-00294-DWL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/25/2024 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00294-DWL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7121 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/25/2024 11:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
