Curry v. Bender, et al.
| JEROME CURRY, JR. |
| ERIN L LENNON, King County Superior Court Clerk, JOANNA BENDER, King County Superior Court, JENNIFER, King County DRW, Judge WHALEN, Washington Supreme Court Olympia, ETOY ALFORD, Kittitas County Attorney, GREGORY L. ZEMPEL, Kittitas County Prosecutor, MATT MILLS, Kittitas County Prosecutor, SARAH KEITH, Kittitas County Court Administrator, KAREN BOWEN, Kittitas County Clerk of Court, KING COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, SARAH PENDLETON, Olympia Duty Clerk, KITTITAS COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, NARESH RAJAN, King County Public Defense Counsel, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC DEFENSE, ZACHARY R. WILLIAMS, Kittitas County Prosecutor, CANDACE L. HOOPER, Kittitas County Superior Court, MARGIE ALUMBAUGH, Kittitas County Attorney, CATHERINE CORNWALL, King County Clerk, PATICIA GOLDMAN, King County Prosecutor, Judge TRACY STABB, Washington State Court of Appeals, Division III, TRISTEN WORTHEN, Spokane County/Division 3 Administrator or Clerk, DAVID KEENAN, King County Judge, LEA ENNIS, King County/Division I Administrator Clerk, ROBERT ROY COSSEY, Spokane County Attorney, KING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, MECHELE STORM, King County ACLU, Mr. CALLNER, Judicial Commission Conduct Olympia, CLAY MYERS, Kittitas County Sheriff, ZACHERY GREEN, Kittitas County Sheriff, TYRELL NIELSEN, Kittitas County, JOSE SERRANO, Kittitas County, CHARLES BERG, Kittitas County, ROBIN LOVELL, Kittitas County, KITCOM, CAD, Kittitas County, SYDNEE STERKEL, Kittitas County, CPL NIELSEN, I-90, WSP's VICTORIA, I-90, CHRISTEN WHITE, I-90, DENSLEY ARON, Kittitas County, THOMAS MEGARGLE, Kittitas County, LOGAN SWIFT, Kittitas County, K. SWIFT, CPC RICHARD PRYOR and KEVIN DONALD BAKER |
| 24-7146 |
| November 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not filed a statement explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous, as ordered by this court on December 4, 2024. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 01/13/2025 02:20 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MAIL RETURNED. DE 3 addressed to Appellant Jerome Curry, Jr.. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 12/31/2024 04:54 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $605.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $605.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:25 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/6/2025. For appeal no. 24-7146, 1:24-cv-03141-TOR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/26/2024 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:24-cv-03141-TOR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7146 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/26/2024 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
