Langham v. Noyd, et al.
| MALIK LANGHAM |
| ELMORE SPENCER, Patrol Officer, CITY OF UNION CITY and JUSTIN NOYD, Patrol Officer |
| 24-7292 |
| December 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 01/14/2025 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Date: 1/9/2025 Time: 11:00 AM Pacific Time The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential.... All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Justin Noyd. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 12/09/2024 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lori A. Sebransky for Appellant Justin Noyd. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Lori A. Sebransky. [Entered: 12/04/2024 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/9/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/10/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 1/9/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/18/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/20/2025. For appeal no. 24-7292, 4:22-cv-06284-YGR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/04/2024 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:22-cv-06284-YGR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7292 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/04/2024 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
