Castillon v. People of the State of California, et al.
Petitioner: PEDRO MEDINA CASTILLON
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and RAYMOND MADDEN
Case Number: 24-7323
Filed: December 5, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2025 Filing 5 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Raymond Madden.--[incorrect entry, brief submitted in wrong case] [Entered: 01/13/2025 03:23 PM] [Edited: 01/14/2025 10:01 AM]
January 13, 2025 Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN [Entered: 01/13/2025 11:54 AM]
December 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [Entered: 12/20/2024 01:45 PM]
December 5, 2024 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. No COA order in district court. [Entered: 12/05/2024 11:21 AM]
December 5, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:21-cv-00973-EMC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7323 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/05/2024 11:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Castillon v. People of the State of California, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Represented By: Kenneth Charles Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RAYMOND MADDEN
Represented By: Michele Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PEDRO MEDINA CASTILLON
Represented By: Pedro Medina Castillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?