Glaros v. California Department of Transportation, et al.
| NICHOLAS GLAROS |
| SON NGUYEN, CAROLYN DABNEY, Program Manager, KIRSTEN BOWMAN, MARK A. BROWN, GRETCHEN MCCROSKEY, Real Estate Agent, CALIFORNIA HOUSING AND FINANCE AGENCY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NICK KUFASIMES, Hosuing Finance Chief, ANGUS CHAN, Right of Way Agent, DOUG HOOVER, Chief Excess Land Branch Right of Way, ANDREW P. NIERENBERG, Deputy District Director Dist 7, TED BALMER, Lawyer Legal and DUSTIN LUCA, Real Estate Agent |
| 24-7328 |
| December 5, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| GLAROS V. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/16/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/31/2025 08:11 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee California Housing and Finance Agency, Appellee Nick Kufasimes, Appellee Ted Balmer. [Entered: 01/31/2025 02:15 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/17/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/29/2025 04:53 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee California Department of Transportation. [Entered: 01/29/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Nicholas Glaros is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 01/17/2025 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Nicholas Glaros. [Entered: 01/17/2025 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Nicholas Glaros. [Entered: 12/23/2024 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/14/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/13/2025. For appeal no. 24-7328, 2:23-cv-08017-TJH-KES. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/05/2024 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-08017-TJH-KES has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7328 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/05/2024 12:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
