Torres Hernandez, et al. v. Su, et al.
| RAMON TORRES HERNANDEZ and FAMILIAS UNIDAS POR LA JUSTICIA, AFL-CIO, a labor organization |
| JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, named as Washington State Employment Security Department and CAMI L. FEEK, in her official capacity as Commissioner |
| 24-7365 |
| December 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TORRES HERNANDEZ, ET AL. V. SU, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Status Conference Call with counsel for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee only, 2/10/2025, 10:30 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [24-7365, 25-314] [Entered: 02/03/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 3/25/2025, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [24-7365, 25-314] [Entered: 01/23/2025 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Julie A. Su, Appellant United States Department of Labor. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-314, 24-7365] [Entered: 01/21/2025 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 8 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/21/2025, Cross Appeal First Brief Due 4/25/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due 5/27/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due 6/26/2025. For appeal no. 24-7365, 1:20-cv-03241-TOR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [25-314, 24-7365] [Entered: 01/16/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 3/25/2025, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/25/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/27/2025, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/10/2025 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 1/9/2025, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:22 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 4) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/14/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/17/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/11/2024 08:40 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Ramon Torres Hernandez, Appellant Familias Unidas por la Justicia, AFL-CIO. [Entered: 12/10/2024 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Ramon Torres Hernandez, Appellant Familias Unidas por la Justicia, AFL-CIO. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 12/10/2024 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/11/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/15/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/14/2025. For appeal no. 24-7365, 1:20-cv-03241-TOR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/06/2024 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:20-cv-03241-TOR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7365 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/06/2024 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
