Eteghaei, et al. v. County of Alameda, et al.
| MITRA ZADE and ARASH ETEGHAEI |
| Officer RILEY WALTER, in his individual and official capacities, Sgt. G. LEVETTE, in his individual and official capacities, Officer JOSHUA ARMILLO, in his individual and official capacities, Sheriff GREGORY JO AHERN, in his individual and official capacities, Lt. MATTHEW FARRUGGIA, in his indidivual and official capacities, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, a state agency, Officer AVILA, in her individual and official capacities, Officer SCOTT BRANDON, in his individual and official capacities, Officer SAMANIEGO, in her Individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, Detective A. MATEEN, in his individual and official capacities, Officer M. MONCADA, in his individual and official capacities and Officer JOSHUA DORMER, in his individual and official capacities |
| 24-7380 |
| December 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Order - General OSC (DE 7) filed by Respondent County of Alameda, Respondent Gregory Jo Ahern, Respondent Matthew Farruggia, Respondent Scott Brandon, Respondent Riley Walter, Respondent A. Mateen, Respondent Joshua Dormer, Respondent M. Moncada, Respondent Joshua Armillo. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 8 and 9.] [Entered: 01/03/2025 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE --- RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 6) filed by Respondent County of Alameda, Respondent Matthew Farruggia, Respondent Scott Brandon, Respondent Riley Walter, Respondent A. Mateen, Respondent Joshua Dormer, Respondent M. Moncada, Respondent Joshua Armillo. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 10.] [Entered: 01/03/2025 04:28 PM] [Edited: 01/03/2025 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE --- RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 6) filed by Respondent County of Alameda, Respondent Gregory Jo Ahern, Respondent Matthew Farruggia, Respondent Scott Brandon, Respondent Riley Walter, Respondent A. Mateen, Respondent Joshua Dormer, Respondent M. Moncada, Respondent Joshua Armillo. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 10.] [Entered: 01/03/2025 04:11 PM] [Edited: 01/03/2025 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 6) filed by Petitioner Arash Eteghaei, Petitioner Mitra Zade. [Entered: 12/23/2024 11:08 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. On December 6, 2024, petitioners submitted two documents to this court: (1) what appears to be a copy of the motion for certification under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) filed in the district court on November 15, 2024; and (2) a copy of the district courts November 26, 2024 order granting that motion. Those documents were not accompanied by a petition directed to this court or any other documents on December 6, 2024. On December 7, 2024, petitioners submitted a corrected petition for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) directed to this court. Within 10 days, petitioners must file a statement explaining whether this court should consider this petition filed on December 6, 2024 or December 7, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) (petition for permission to appeal must be filed within ten days after the district courts certification order). Respondents may file a response within 10 days after petitioners statement. [Entered: 12/11/2024 04:28 PM]
|
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/7/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7380 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Arash Eteghaei, Petitioner Mitra Zade. [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Arash Eteghaei, Petitioner Mitra Zade. [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Arash Eteghaei, Petitioner Mitra Zade. [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
