James v. State of California, et al.
| RONALD EUGENE JAMES |
| SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL HAHN, JOSEPH THEBEAU, JANINE LEROSE, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and XAVIER BECERRA |
| 24-7405 |
| December 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Ronald Eugene James. [Case dismissed 1/24/25.] [Entered: 02/06/2025 01:04 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. PAEZ, BYBEE, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; United States v. Almany, 872 F.2d 924, 926 (9th Cir. 1989) (order denying motion for discovery is not appealable); see also Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir. 1976) (district court must be of the opinion that the criteria of section 1292(b) are met; court of appeals is without authority to assume an appeal unilaterally). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/24/2025 10:10 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Ronald Eugene James. [Entered: 01/22/2025 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Ronald Eugene James. [Entered: 12/26/2024 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kate Daz Lynn Brosseau for Appellee Daniel Hahn, Appellee Janine LeRose, Appellee Joseph Thebeau, Appellee Sacramento Police Department. [Entered: 12/10/2024 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/20/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/18/2025. For appeal no. 24-7405, 2:21-cv-00713-JDP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/10/2024 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-00713-JDP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7405 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/10/2024 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
