Alonso-Campos, et al. v. Bondi
| BRYAM GAEL ALONSO-SERRANO, YENNISON ALEXANDER ALONSO-SERRANO, CARLOS ALEXANDER ALONSO-CAMPOS and MARIA DILCIA SERRANO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-7477 |
| December 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/07/2025 06:30 AM] |
| Filing 18 Respondent James R. McHenry III substituted by Pamela Bondi effective 02/06/2025. [Entered: 02/07/2025 04:35 AM] |
| Filing 17 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Petitioner Monica Ganjoo, representing Petitioner Bryam Gael Alonso-Serrano, Petitioner Carlos Alexander Alonso-Campos, Petitioner Maria Dilcia Serrano, Petitioner Yennison Alexander Alonso-Serrano. [Entered: 02/05/2025 02:46 PM] |
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 15) of Monica Ganjoo to withdraw as counsel for petitioners is granted. The Clerk will amend the record to reflect that Monica Ganjoo is no longer counsel of record for petitioners. Petitioners remain represented by Christopher James Todd. Pursuant to the courts January 17, 2025, order at Docket Entry No. 13, the filing and docketing fees or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis remain due on or before February 18, 2025. The opening brief is due March 3, 2025. The answering brief is due April 1, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/05/2025 02:45 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Monica Ganjoo for Petitioner Carlos Alexander Alonso-Campos, Petitioner Maria Dilcia Serrano, Petitioner Bryam Gael Alonso-Serrano, Petitioner Yennison Alexander Alonso-Serrano. [Entered: 02/03/2025 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 14 Respondent Merrick B. Garland substituted by James R. McHenry III effective 01/21/2025. [Entered: 01/21/2025 09:04 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to February 18, 2025, to pay the filing and docketing fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The opening brief remains due March 3, 2025. The answering brief is due April 1, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/17/2025 09:30 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Court Order filed by Petitioner Carlos Alexander Alonso-Campos, Petitioner Maria Dilcia Serrano, Petitioner Bryam Gael Alonso-Serrano, Petitioner Yennison Alexander Alonso-Serrano. [Entered: 01/16/2025 07:42 AM] |
| Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Christopher James Todd [Entered: 01/08/2025 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher James Todd for Petitioner Bryam Gael Alonso-Serrano, Petitioner Carlos Alexander Alonso-Campos, Petitioner Maria Dilcia Serrano, Petitioner Yennison Alexander Alonso-Serrano. [Entered: 01/08/2025 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 12/26/2024 05:49 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioners must pay a $600 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioners do not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioners. [Entered: 12/19/2024 10:07 AM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Carmel Aileen Morgan [Entered: 12/12/2024 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmel Aileen Morgan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/12/2024 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 1/21/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 2/11/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 3/3/2025, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 4/1/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 12/12/2024 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/12/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7477 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/12/2024 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 12/12/2024 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 12/6/2024. [Entered: 12/12/2024 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Bryam Gael Alonso-Serrano, Petitioner Carlos Alexander Alonso-Campos, Petitioner Maria Dilcia Serrano, Petitioner Yennison Alexander Alonso-Serrano. [Entered: 12/12/2024 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.