United States of America v. Sims
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAMES ROBERT SIMS |
| 24-7591 |
| December 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James Robert Sims. [Entered: 02/14/2025 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 21 ANSWERING BRIEF UNDER SEAL submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America. (Court entered filing of sealed brief originally submitted at DE 16) [Entered: 02/06/2025 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant James Robert Sims received. [Entered: 02/06/2025 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 3 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 7 and DE 11 by Appellant James Robert Sims received. Volume 3 is filed UNDER SEAL. [Entered: 02/06/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 18 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 02/06/2025 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 17 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 02/06/2025 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 02/06/2025 02:02 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant James Robert Sims is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 7, 11 by Appellant James Robert Sims are filed. Volume 3 is filed UNDER SEAL. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/31/2025 04:49 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) to file under seal Volume 3 of the excerpts of record is granted because an independent review of the document demonstrates that continued sealing is warranted. Appellant is advised that the sealing of a document in the district court is not a sufficient basis for sealing it in this court. Any future motion to seal filed by counsel must explain the specific reasons for sealing in this court, describe the potential for irreparable injury absent sealing, and limit the request for sealing to the specific documents or portions of documents that merit sealing. 9th Cir. R. 27-13(e). The clerk will file publicly the motion to seal and certificate of service (Docket Entry No. 8.1 and 8.3), opening brief (Docket Entry No. 6), and Volumes 1-2 of the excerpts of record (Docket Entry No. 7). The clerk will maintain under seal Volume 3 of the excerpts of record (Docket Entry No. 11). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 01/31/2025 11:27 AM]
|
| Filing 13 PHYSICAL EXHIBITS (4 copies) filed by Appellant: video exhibit on USB drive. [Entered: 01/17/2025 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 12 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Tania M. Culbertson [Entered: 01/16/2025 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tania M. Culbertson for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 01/16/2025 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for leave to transmit physical exhibit is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 27-14. Counsel must submit 4 copies of the exhibit within 7 days of this order. [Entered: 01/15/2025 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volume 3 UNDER SEAL submitted for filing by Appellant James Robert Sims. (Court entered filing of sealed vol originally submitted at DE 8) [Entered: 01/16/2025 03:24 PM] [Edited: 01/16/2025 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant James Robert Sims.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDFs] (COURT UPDATE: UNSEALED DE 8.1 & 8.3 PER DE 14) [Entered: 01/13/2025 05:18 PM] [Edited: 01/31/2025 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 7 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant James Robert Sims.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts] [Entered: 01/13/2025 05:08 PM] [Edited: 01/16/2025 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James Robert Sims.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF] [Entered: 01/13/2025 04:59 PM] [Edited: 01/16/2025 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Transmit Physical Exhibit filed by Appellant James Robert Sims. [Entered: 01/13/2025 10:42 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to expedite the briefing of this appeal is granted. The opening brief is due January 13, 2025. The answering brief is due February 7, 2025. The optional reply brief is due February 14, 2025. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31- 2.2(a)(1). No written motions for extensions of time under Ninth Circuit Rule 31- 2.2(b) will be granted absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances. [Entered: 12/30/2024 10:17 AM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite filed by Appellant James Robert Sims. [Entered: 12/27/2024 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 3 months. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/30/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 1/29/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/10/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/9/2025. For appeal no. 24-7591, 2:18-cr-00262-JLR-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 12/17/2024 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:18-cr-00262-JLR-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7591 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/17/2024 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Sims | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Teal Luthy Miller |
| Represented By: | Matthew P. Hampton |
| Represented By: | Ms. Tania M. Culbertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JAMES ROBERT SIMS | |
| Represented By: | Mukund Rathi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
