San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper, et al. v. County of San Luis Obispo
Plaintiff: LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO COASTKEEPER, ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION and CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER ALLIANCE
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE, ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES and CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 24-7807
Filed: December 27, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 3, 2025 SAN LUIS OBISPO COASTKEEPER, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
December 3, 2025 Summary SAN LUIS OBISPO COASTKEEPER V. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER FILED. Amicus Brief submitted at DE 15 by Amici Curiae Association of California Water Agencies, California State Association of Counties, and California Special Districts Association is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Amici must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with green front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/24/2025 12:32 PM]
February 24, 2025 Filing 29 ADDED Amici Curiae Association of California Water Agencies, California State Association of Counties, and California Special Districts Association. [Entered: 02/24/2025 12:25 PM]
February 13, 2025 Filing 28 Paper copies (6) of Amicus Brief submitted at DE 21 by City of Arroyo Grande received. [Entered: 02/13/2025 12:04 PM]
February 7, 2025 Filing 27 Paper copies (6) of Amicus Brief submitted at DE 13 by Pacific Legal Foundation and California Farm Bureau Federation received. [Entered: 02/07/2025 04:09 PM]
February 6, 2025 Filing 26 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo received. [Entered: 02/06/2025 03:38 PM]
February 6, 2025 Filing 25 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 32 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 10 by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo received. [Entered: 02/06/2025 03:37 PM]
February 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER FILED. Amicus Brief submitted at DE 21 by City of Arroyo Grande is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Amicus must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with green front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/06/2025 03:10 PM]
February 6, 2025 Filing 23 ADDED Amicus Curiae City of Arroyo Grande. [Entered: 02/06/2025 03:08 PM]
February 4, 2025 Filing 22 JOINDER LETTER in lieu of amicus brief (CR 29-1 Note) filed by Oceano Community Services District, City of Pismo Beach, City of Grover Beach. [Entered: 02/04/2025 04:40 PM]
February 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Amicus Brief submitted at DE 13 by Pacific Legal Foundation and California Farm Bureau Federation is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Amici must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with green front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/04/2025 10:07 AM]
February 4, 2025 Filing 19 ADDED Amici Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation and California Farm Bureau Federation. [Entered: 02/04/2025 09:43 AM]
February 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted in part. The answering brief is due March 7, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/04/2025 09:35 AM]
February 1, 2025 Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief (DE 11) filed by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo. [Entered: 01/31/2025 05:59 PM]
January 31, 2025 Filing 21 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by City of Arroyo Grande.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief, backdated entry to reflect original submission date] [Entered: 02/04/2025 03:55 PM] [Edited: 02/06/2025 02:55 PM]
January 31, 2025 Filing 17 DEFECTIVE --- AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by City of Arroyo Grande. (Wrong filing type, see DE 21) [Entered: 01/31/2025 06:17 PM] [Edited: 02/06/2025 02:53 PM]
January 31, 2025 Filing 15 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Assoc of California Water Agencies, California State Assoc of Counties, & California Special Districts Ass. --[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief, updated entry to correct filer] [Entered: 01/31/2025 04:32 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2025 03:49 PM]
January 31, 2025 Filing 14 DEFECTIVE --- AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Oceano Community Services District, City of Pismo Beach, City of Grover Beach. (Wrong filing type, see DE 22) [Entered: 01/31/2025 03:20 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2025 02:49 PM]
January 31, 2025 Filing 13 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Pacific Legal Foundation and California Farm Bureau Federation. [Entered: 01/31/2025 03:00 PM]
January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 10 by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/31/2025 11:50 AM]
January 29, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper, Appellee Los Padres Forestwatch, Appellee California Coastkeeper Alliance, Appellee Ecological Rights Foundation. [Entered: 01/29/2025 07:01 PM]
January 24, 2025 Filing 10 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts] [Entered: 01/24/2025 06:28 PM] [Edited: 01/31/2025 09:41 AM]
January 24, 2025 Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief] [Entered: 01/24/2025 05:40 PM] [Edited: 01/30/2025 04:30 PM]
January 8, 2025 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo. [Entered: 01/08/2025 12:00 PM]
January 2, 2025 Filing 7 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant County of San Luis Obispo. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/02/2025 02:59 PM]
January 2, 2025 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Benjamin Zachary Rubin [Entered: 01/02/2025 02:53 PM]
January 2, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Benjamin Zachary Rubin for Appellant County of San Luis Obispo. [Entered: 01/02/2025 02:41 PM]
January 2, 2025 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Brian Ferrasci-O'Malley [Entered: 01/02/2025 01:23 PM]
January 2, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Ferrasci-O'Malley for Appellant County of San Luis Obispo. [Entered: 01/02/2025 01:06 PM]
December 27, 2024 Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/2/2025, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/24/2025, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/21/2025. For appeal no. 24-7807, 2:24-cv-06854-SPG-AS.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/27/2024 04:22 PM]
December 27, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-06854-SPG-AS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7807 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/27/2024 04:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper, et al. v. County of San Luis Obispo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH
Represented By: Mr. Drevet John Hunt
Represented By: Marla Fox
Represented By: Brian Orion
Represented By: Mr. Christopher Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SAN LUIS OBISPO COASTKEEPER
Represented By: Mr. Drevet John Hunt
Represented By: Marla Fox
Represented By: Brian Orion
Represented By: Mr. Christopher Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION
Represented By: Mr. Drevet John Hunt
Represented By: Marla Fox
Represented By: Brian Orion
Represented By: Mr. Christopher Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER ALLIANCE
Represented By: Mr. Drevet John Hunt
Represented By: Marla Fox
Represented By: Brian Orion
Represented By: Mr. Christopher Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Represented By: Paul S. Weiland
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin Zachary Rubin
Represented By: Brian Ferrasci-O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION
Represented By: Damien Michael Schiff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
Represented By: Damien Michael Schiff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Represented By: Barbara Anne Brenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES
Represented By: Mr. Jeremy Nathan Jungreis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
Represented By: Mr. Jeremy Nathan Jungreis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Mr. Jeremy Nathan Jungreis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?