Smith v. Baca, et al.
Plaintiff: JACOB SMITH
Defendant: STEVE DANIELS, Substituted in for NDOC Director Doe (ECF No. 16) agent of Charles Daniels, CHARLES DANIELS, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Caseworker: Substituted by Edward Gibson (ECF No. 16), EDWARD GIBSON, Substituted in for Caseworker Doe (ECF No. 16), ISIDRO BACA, Warden and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, Substituted by Steve Daniels (ECF No. 16)
Case Number: 24-7816
Filed: December 30, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. (TEXT ONLY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 11, 2025. The answering brief is due May 12, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/07/2025 10:49 AM]
February 5, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Isidro Baca, Appellant Edward Gibson, Appellant Charles Daniels. [Entered: 02/05/2025 02:37 PM]
January 7, 2025 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Chris Davis [Entered: 01/07/2025 02:28 PM]
January 7, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Chris Davis for Appellant Charles Daniels, Appellant Edward Gibson, Appellant Isidro Baca. [Entered: 01/07/2025 12:36 PM]
December 30, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/10/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/10/2025. For appeal no. 24-7816, 3:22-cv-00522-MMD-CSD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/30/2024 11:07 AM]
December 30, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cv-00522-MMD-CSD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7816 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/30/2024 10:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Smith v. Baca, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVE DANIELS, Substituted in for NDOC Director Doe (ECF No. 16) agent of Charles Daniels
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES DANIELS
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Caseworker: Substituted by Edward Gibson (ECF No. 16)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD GIBSON, Substituted in for Caseworker Doe (ECF No. 16)
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ISIDRO BACA, Warden
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, Substituted by Steve Daniels (ECF No. 16)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JACOB SMITH
Represented By: Jacob Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?