Reyes-Hernandez v. Garland
| JOSE GUILLERMO REYES-HERNANDEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-816 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Cardozo Payne [Entered: 02/16/2024 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Abigail Evelyn Leach [Entered: 02/16/2024 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/16/2024 05:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Abigail Evelyn Leach for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/16/2024 05:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 3/26/2024, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 4/16/2024, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 5/6/2024, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 6/4/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/15/2024 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Jose Guillermo Reyes-Hernandez. REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 02/15/2024 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/15/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-816 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/15/2024 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Jose Guillermo Reyes-Hernandez. [Entered: 02/15/2024 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Reyes-Hernandez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE GUILLERMO REYES-HERNANDEZ | |
| Represented By: | Murray David Hilts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Abigail Evelyn Leach |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. Anthony Cardozo Payne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
