Lewis, et al. v. Nanos, et al.
| ANNA CHRISTINE LEWIS and BRADLEY LEWIS, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Bradley Alexander Lewis, Anna Christine Lewis, Bradley Lewis, Helen Stricklen and Ralph Rust Stricklen |
| CHRIS NANOS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pima County, Arizona, GILBERT CAUDILLO, Pima County Sheriff Deputy, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the County of Pima, Arizona, and his official capacity as Sheriff Deputy of the Pima County Sheriff's Department, MICHAEL MOSELEY, Pima County Sheriff Deputy, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the County of Pima, Arizona, and his official capacity as Sheriff Deputy of the Pima County Sheriff's Office and COUNTY OF PIMA |
| 25-1025 |
| February 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Anna Christine Lewis, Appellee Bradley Lewis. [Entered: 04/17/2025 10:47 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/30/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/30/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/24/2025 03:45 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Chris Nanos, Appellant Gilbert Caudillo, Appellant Michael Moseley, Appellant County of Pima. [Entered: 03/24/2025 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. [Entered: 03/10/2025 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Chris Nanos, Appellant Gilbert Caudillo, Appellant Michael Moseley, Appellant County of Pima. [Entered: 03/05/2025 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 3/10/2025, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 02/26/2025 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Chris Nanos, Appellant Gilbert Caudillo, Appellant Michael Moseley, Appellant County of Pima. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/24/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/31/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/30/2025. For appeal no. 25-1025, 4:21-cv-00557-RM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:21-cv-00557-RM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1025 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lewis, et al. v. Nanos, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANNA CHRISTINE LEWIS | |
| Represented By: | Eduardo H. Coronado |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRADLEY LEWIS, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Bradley Alexander Lewis, Anna Christine Lewis, Bradley Lewis, Helen Stricklen and Ralph Rust Stricklen | |
| Represented By: | Eduardo H. Coronado |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHRIS NANOS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pima County, Arizona | |
| Represented By: | Daryl Alan Audilett |
| Represented By: | Mr. Andrew J. Petersen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GILBERT CAUDILLO, Pima County Sheriff Deputy, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the County of Pima, Arizona, and his official capacity as Sheriff Deputy of the Pima County Sheriff's Department | |
| Represented By: | Daryl Alan Audilett |
| Represented By: | Mr. Andrew J. Petersen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHAEL MOSELEY, Pima County Sheriff Deputy, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the County of Pima, Arizona, and his official capacity as Sheriff Deputy of the Pima County Sheriff's Office | |
| Represented By: | Daryl Alan Audilett |
| Represented By: | Mr. Andrew J. Petersen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COUNTY OF PIMA | |
| Represented By: | Daryl Alan Audilett |
| Represented By: | Mr. Andrew J. Petersen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
