Freeman v. Gutierrez
| JAMES FREEMAN |
| M. GUTIERREZ, Warden |
| 25-1032 |
| February 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 District Court Order/Notice Received. [Entered: 04/16/2025 09:44 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Appellant filed a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition and the district court determined that the claims arise under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2253(c) therefore appear to apply to this case....This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify the issues that meet the required showing; if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court is requested to state its reasons. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The briefing schedule is vacated. The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district judge. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 04/03/2025 01:47 PM]
|
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant James Freeman is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 03/31/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James Freeman. [Entered: 03/31/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/2/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-1032, 4:24-cv-00129-RCC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:24-cv-00129-RCC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1032 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Freeman v. Gutierrez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JAMES FREEMAN | |
| Represented By: | James Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M. GUTIERREZ, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Denise Ann Faulk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
