Brock, et al. v. City of Bellingham, et al.
| MICHAEL BROCK, MATTHEW LEROY ALLBAUGH, CRAIG BREWER, KELLY GAMBINI, ROBERT VINCENT GLORIOSO, JASON HAGIN, DANIEL LARSEN, BRIAN LONG, SHAWN CURTIS MANTHEY, PAUL PLUSCHAKOV, CALEB RODRIGUEZ, HANNAH SNAVELY, ANGELA TERRY, DION TERRY, TAWSHA KATHLEEN THOMPSON, WILLIAM TRAVIS TRUEMAN, TIMOTHY VAN DYKE, TIM VANDERMEY, ELISABETH OAKES, GALINA D'AMELIO, JOEL DOUGLAS, BRENNAN JACOBY, JEREMIAH LELAND, DAVID LITTLE, NEAL LUNDE and REBEKAH ROYEV |
| CITY OF BELLINGHAM and SETH FLEETWOOD, Mayor, City of Bellingham, Washington |
| 25-1070 |
| February 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| BROCK, ET AL. V. CITY OF BELLINGHAM, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/2/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/2/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/21/2025 02:50 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Michael Brock, Appellant Matthew Leroy Allbaugh, Appellant Craig Brewer, Appellant Kelly Gambini, Appellant Robert Vincent Glorioso, Appellant Jason Hagin, Appellant Daniel Larsen, Appellant Brian Long, Appellant Shawn Curtis Manthey, Appellant Paul Pluschakov, Appellant Caleb Rodriguez, Appellant Hannah Snavely, Appellant Angela Terry, Appellant Dion Terry, Appellant Tawsha Kathleen Thompson, Appellant William Travis Trueman, Appellant Timothy Van Dyke, Appellant Tim VanderMey, Appellant Elisabeth Oakes, Appellant Galina D'Amelio, Appellant Joel Douglas, Appellant Brennan Jacoby, Appellant Jeremiah Leland, Appellant David Little, Appellant Neal Lunde, Appellant Rebekah Royev. [Entered: 03/21/2025 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Vanessa Williams-Hall [Entered: 02/27/2025 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Vanessa Williams-Hall for Appellee City of Bellingham, Appellee Seth Fleetwood. [Entered: 02/27/2025 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 02/26/2025 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER: By 3/5/2025, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Michael Brock, Appellant Matthew Leroy Allbaugh, Appellant Craig Brewer, Appellant Kelly Gambini, Appellant Robert Vincent Glorioso, Appellant Jason Hagin, Appellant Daniel Larsen, Appellant Brian Long, Appellant Shawn Curtis Manthey, Appellant Paul Pluschakov, Appellant Caleb Rodriguez, Appellant Hannah Snavely, Appellant Angela Terry, Appellant Dion Terry, Appellant Tawsha Kathleen Thompson, Appellant William Travis Trueman, Appellant Timothy Van Dyke, Appellant Tim VanderMey, Appellant Elisabeth Oakes, Appellant Galina D'Amelio, Appellant Joel Douglas, Appellant Brennan Jacoby, Appellant Jeremiah Leland, Appellant David Little, Appellant Neal Lunde, Appellant Rebekah Royev. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/24/2025 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/25/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/2/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-1070, 2:24-cv-00850-BJR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/20/2025 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-00850-BJR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1070 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/20/2025 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
