Meineke Franchisor SPV, LLC, et al. v. CJGL, Inc., et al.
| MEINEKE FRANCHISOR SPV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MEINEKE REALTY, INC., a North Carolina corporation, CJGL, INC., a California corporation, CARL DOUMA, an individual and JAN DOUMA, an individual |
| ECONO LUBE AND TUNE, INC. |
| 25-1142 |
| February 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| MEINEKE FRANCHISOR SPV, LLC, ET AL. V. CJGL, INC., ET AL.Los Angeles, Central CaliforniaCivilWardlaw, Kim McLane, Owens, John B., de Alba, Ana |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Mediation Appellant Status Report due (Appellant) 5/7/2025, Mediation Appellee Status Report due (Appellee) 5/7/2025, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/16/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/16/2025 . See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 04/08/2025 02:50 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Appellants unopposed motion to dismiss appeal no. 25-1556 (Docket Entry No. 5) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees as to appeal no. 25-1556 only. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court as to appeal no. 25-1556. Appeal no. 25-1142 shall proceed. The assessment conference scheduled for April 8, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific time remains on calendar. The briefing schedule in appeal no. 25-1142 is reset as follows: the opening brief is due May 15, 2025; the answering brief is due June 16, 2025; the optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/28/2025 04:32 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Meineke Franchisor SPV, LLC. [25-1556, 25-1142] [Entered: 03/26/2025 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/08/2025, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [25-1142, 25-1556] [Entered: 03/17/2025 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Meineke Franchisor SPV, LLC. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-1556, 25-1142] [Entered: 03/17/2025 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/17/2025, Cross Appeal First Brief Due 5/15/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due 6/16/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due 7/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-1142, 2:23-cv-00374-SPG-JC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [25-1556, 25-1142] [Entered: 03/11/2025 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Meineke Franchisor SPV, LLC, Appellee Meineke Realty, Inc.. [Entered: 03/10/2025 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 4/1/2025, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 03/07/2025 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant CJGL, Inc., Appellant Carl Douma, Appellant Jan Douma. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/03/2025 06:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/3/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/6/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/7/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/15/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-1142, 2:23-cv-00374-SPG-JC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00374-SPG-JC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1142 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
