Sunday Red, LLC v. Tigeraire, Inc.
| TIGERAIRE, INC. |
| SUNDAY RED, LLC |
| 25-1175 |
| February 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. (Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA) The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for leave to file a reply in support of the petition is granted. The petition for permission to appeal is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). Within 14 days, petitioner must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d)(1). [Entered: 03/28/2025 01:51 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Reply filed by Petitioner Tigeraire, Inc.. [Entered: 03/20/2025 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Tigeraire, Inc.. [Entered: 03/20/2025 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Respondent Sunday Red, LLC. [Entered: 03/06/2025 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) (DE 1) filed by Respondent Sunday Red, LLC. [Entered: 03/06/2025 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Josiah Lloyd Alter [Entered: 03/04/2025 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Josiah Lloyd Alter for Respondent Sunday Red, LLC. [Entered: 03/04/2025 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Adam Howard Charnes [Entered: 02/27/2025 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Adam Howard Charnes for Respondent Sunday Red, LLC. [Entered: 02/27/2025 06:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 02/25/2025 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/24/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1175 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 02/25/2025 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Tigeraire, Inc.. [Entered: 02/25/2025 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sunday Red, LLC v. Tigeraire, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: SUNDAY RED, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Richard Charles Henn, Jr |
| Represented By: | Nancy Louise Stagg |
| Represented By: | Mr. Adam Howard Charnes |
| Represented By: | Mr. Josiah Lloyd Alter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TIGERAIRE, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Deborah Yoon Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.