Tatchi v. TransUnion, et al.
| TAOMA TATCHI |
| TRANSUNION, EQUIFAX INC., EXPERIAN PLC, MYFICO, LLC, AMERICAN EXPRESS MASTER TRUST, CHAPMAN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC, CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, JIM CLICK FORD, INC. and AN LUXURY IMPORTS OF TUCSON INC. |
| 25-1194 |
| February 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 23) filed by Appellee TransUnion. [Court entered filing to correct DE 24] [Entered: 04/25/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE---RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 22) filed by Appellee TransUnion. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 25] [Entered: 04/25/2025 09:38 AM] [Edited: 04/25/2025 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 22) filed by Appellant Taoma Tatchi. [Entered: 04/15/2025 03:34 PM] |
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous based on appellants statement in response to this order and the opening brief filed March 12, 2025. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 03/31/2025 09:53 AM]
|
|
Filing 21
District Court Order/Notice Received. [ ORDER denying [78] Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis, and this Court certifies that Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis for the reasons stated. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 03/24/2025. [Entered: 03/25/2025 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Taoma Tatchi. [Entered: 03/19/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 19 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Capital One, LLC. [Entered: 03/12/2025 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Wade Burgeson for Appellee Capital One, LLC. [Entered: 03/12/2025 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Appellant Taoma Tatchi is filed. Original and 6 copies. [Entered: 03/12/2025 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Taoma Tatchi. [Entered: 03/12/2025 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Jim Click Ford Incorporated. [Entered: 03/12/2025 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Chapman Automotive Group, LLC. [Entered: 03/12/2025 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Autonationdirect.com Incorporated. [Entered: 03/11/2025 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Experian PLC. [Entered: 03/10/2025 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee American Express Master Trust. [Entered: 03/07/2025 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen J. Newman for Appellee American Express Master Trust. [Entered: 03/07/2025 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 9 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Kathryn Gasior, representing Appellee Experian PLC. [Entered: 03/05/2025 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Thomas N. Abbott [Entered: 03/05/2025 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Kathryn Gasior. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): Yes [Experian PLC]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 03/05/2025 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas N. Abbott for Appellee Experian PLC. [Entered: 03/05/2025 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee TransUnion. [Entered: 02/26/2025 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Camille R. Nicodemus [Entered: 02/26/2025 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Camille R. Nicodemus for Appellee TransUnion. [Entered: 02/26/2025 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/7/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/7/2025. For appeal no. 25-1194, 4:24-cv-00602-RM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:24-cv-00602-RM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1194 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/25/2025 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
