Dahlin, et al. v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
| JAMES DAHLIN and KIMBERLY DAHLIN |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO |
| ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, CURT RANSOM, PHILLIP ISETTA, THOMAS SHERIFF, ANGELA MCCOLLOUGH and TUCKER HUEY |
| 25-1244 |
| February 27, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA) Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. Petitioners motion for a stay (Docket Entry No. 7) is denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 03/26/2025 09:18 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Underlying Proceedings filed by Petitioner James Dahlin, Petitioner Kimberly Dahlin. [Entered: 03/25/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner James Dahlin, Petitioner Kimberly Dahlin. [Court entered filing to correct DE's 4 and 5] [Entered: 03/03/2025 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 DEFECTIVE---OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner James Dahlin, Petitioner Kimberly Dahlin. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 02/28/2025 02:49 PM] [Edited: 03/03/2025 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 DEFECTIVE---EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Petitioner James Dahlin, Petitioner Kimberly Dahlin. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 02/28/2025 11:25 AM] [Edited: 03/03/2025 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 02/27/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/26/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1244 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 02/27/2025 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner James Dahlin, Petitioner Kimberly Dahlin. [Entered: 02/27/2025 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.