Nguyen v. One Finance, Inc., et al.
| JONATHAN NGUYEN |
| ONE FINANCE, INC. and COINBASE, INC. |
| 25-1290 |
| February 28, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Appellants motions for voluntary dismissal (Docket Entry No. 11 in 25-1290 and Docket Entry No. 11 in 25-1292) are granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Dismissal is without prejudice to any party filing a new appeal from a subsequently entered appealable order. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [25-1290, 25-1292] [Entered: 04/03/2025 04:43 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant One Finance, Inc.. [25-1292, 25-1290] [Entered: 04/03/2025 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. [25-1290, 25-1292] [Entered: 03/27/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee One Finance, Inc.. [25-1290, 25-1292] [Entered: 03/13/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant One Finance, Inc.. [25-1292, 25-1290] [Entered: 03/13/2025 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 3/14/2025, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [25-1290, 25-1292] [Entered: 03/07/2025 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-1290, 25-1292] [Entered: 03/05/2025 08:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE---MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellee One Finance, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-1290, 25-1292] [PDF duplicate of DE 5] [Entered: 03/05/2025 02:31 PM] [Edited: 03/06/2025 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant One Finance, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-1292, 25-1290] [Entered: 03/05/2025 02:29 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. On June 3, 2024, the district court granted plaintiff Nguyen and defendant Coinbase, Inc.s stipulation to compel arbitration and stay proceedings as to defendant Coinbase, Inc. On November 20, 2024, the district court granted defendant One Finance, Inc.s motion to dismiss. A district courts dismissal order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291, however, unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Because the claims against defendant Coinbase, Inc. remain pending in the district court, this court may therefore lack jurisdiction over these cross-appeals. Within 14 days, appellant Nguyen must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal No. 25-1290 or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. Within 10 days after appellant files a motion or statement, cross-appellant One Finance, Inc. must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal No. 25-1292 or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellant files a statement, cross-appellant may also file a response at that time. If either party fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss their respective appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed. [25-1290, 25-1292] [Entered: 03/04/2025 11:51 AM]
|
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due 3/5/2025, Cross Appeal First Brief Due 4/9/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due 5/9/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due 6/9/2025. For appeal no. 25-1290, 2:24-cv-02818-ODW-JPR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [25-1292, 25-1290] [Entered: 02/28/2025 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/5/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/9/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/9/2025. For appeal no. 25-1290, 2:24-cv-02818-ODW-JPR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/28/2025 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-02818-ODW-JPR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1290 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/28/2025 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
