Wang v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Petitioner: HAO ZHE WANG
Respondent: UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Real Party In Interest: AT&T INC. and SNOWFLAKE INC.
Case Number: 25-1418
Filed: March 6, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for an extension of time is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [Entered: 08/19/2025 02:55 PM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File to Reconsider filed by Petitioner Hao Zhe Wang. [COURT UPDATE: Attached cover of motion.] [Entered: 04/16/2025 08:30 AM] [Edited: 04/16/2025 09:16 AM]
March 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, BADE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Uber Techs., Inc. v. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidist. Litig., No. 23-3445, slip op. at 9, 20-21 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2025). The petition is denied. DENIED [Entered: 03/25/2025 04:40 PM]
March 19, 2025 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest AT&T Inc.. [Entered: 03/19/2025 02:40 PM]
March 17, 2025 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of unregistered attorneys Counsel for Real Party in Interest C. Shawn Cleveland, Counsel for Real Party in Interest Tamara D. Baggett, representing Real Party in Interest AT&T Inc.. Party has alternate counsel. [Entered: 03/17/2025 08:44 AM]
March 6, 2025 Filing 4 FEE PAID by Hao Zhe Wang - $600.00 - Check [Entered: 03/06/2025 08:56 AM]
March 6, 2025 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 03/06/2025 08:54 AM]
March 6, 2025 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/4/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1418 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 03/06/2025 08:52 AM]
March 6, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Hao Zhe Wang. [Entered: 03/06/2025 08:50 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Wang v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: HAO ZHE WANG
Represented By: Hao Zhe Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: AT&T INC.
Represented By: Tamara D. Baggett
Represented By: Gilbert Stephen Keteltas
Represented By: C. Shawn Cleveland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: SNOWFLAKE INC.
Represented By: Mr. Stephen Broome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?