Stenson v. Leenstra, et al.
| DEREK STENSON, as Personal Representative of the estate of Joshua Ross Sarrett |
| DOES 1-10, JACOB LEENSTRA, KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, a Washington State Government entity and JANE DOE LEENSTRA |
| 25-143 |
| January 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. 9), these appeals are voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. The conference previously scheduled for March 11, 2025, is canceled. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [25-143, 25-326] [Entered: 02/25/2025 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Jacob Leenstra. [25-143, 25-326] [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:15 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address whether this court has jurisdiction over cross-appeal No. 25- 326. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (a district order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b)); see also Horton by Horton v. City of Santa Maria, 915 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2019) ([A] pendent appellate claim can be regarded as inextricably intertwined with a properly reviewable claim on collateral appeal only if the pendent claim is coterminous with, or subsumed in, the claim before the court on interlocutory appeal that is, when the appellate resolution of the collateral appeal necessarily resolves the pendent claim as well. (quoting Huskey v. City of San Jose, 204 F.3d 893, 905 (9th Cir. 2000))). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [25-326, 25-143] [Entered: 02/12/2025 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 3/11/2025, 11:00 am Pacific Time. See order for instructions and details. [25-143, 25-326] [Entered: 02/11/2025 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 2/11/2025, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (originally 02/04/2025). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [25-143, 25-326] [Entered: 01/21/2025 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/22/2025, Cross Appeal First Brief Due 2/18/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due 3/20/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due 4/21/2025. For appeal no. 25-143, 2:23-cv-01316-MJP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [25-326, 25-143] [Entered: 01/17/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/4/2025, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/17/2025 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Jacob Leenstra. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/10/2025 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/13/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/18/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/20/2025. For appeal no. 25-143, 2:23-cv-01316-MJP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/08/2025 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01316-MJP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-143 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/08/2025 04:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
