Patel, et al. v. City of Stanton, et al.
Plaintiff: DEEPA PATEL and CALIFORNIA ONE HOSPITALITY, LLC
Defendant: CITY OF STANTON and DOES
Case Number: 25-1543
Filed: March 10, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Appellant did not file the opening brief by the due date. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 05/15/2025 04:14 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 9 DEFECTIVE---ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami for Appellee City of Stanton. Hearing in in , on . Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [No oral argument scheduled] [Entered: 04/22/2025 03:26 PM] [Edited: 04/22/2025 03:39 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami [Entered: 04/22/2025 02:49 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami for Appellee City of Stanton. [Entered: 04/22/2025 02:39 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Daniel Phillip Barer [Entered: 04/22/2025 02:25 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Phillip Barer for Appellee City of Stanton. [Entered: 04/22/2025 02:17 PM]
April 2, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER (text only). This case is released from the court's mediation program. Counsel may contact the Circuit Mediation Office at [email protected] to discuss services available through the Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 04/02/2025 10:05 AM]
March 27, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/31/2025. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:41 PM]
March 10, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/17/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/21/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/19/2025. For appeal no. 25-1543, 8:24-cv-00780-CAS-DFM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/10/2025 04:34 PM]
March 10, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:24-cv-00780-CAS-DFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1543 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/10/2025 04:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Patel, et al. v. City of Stanton, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEEPA PATEL
Represented By: Mr. Frank Alan Weiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA ONE HOSPITALITY, LLC
Represented By: Mr. Frank Alan Weiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF STANTON
Represented By: Konrad Muth Rasmussen
Represented By: Mr. John P. McCormick
Represented By: Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami
Represented By: Mr. Daniel Phillip Barer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?