Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff: FREDERICK DAVID PINA
Defendant: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 25-1638
Filed: March 12, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to Reinstate filed by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [COURT NOTE: No action necessary, no further filings order entered on 03/27/2025.] [Entered: 05/03/2025 09:40 AM] [Edited: 05/05/2025 07:39 AM]
April 20, 2025 Filing 10 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 9.] [Entered: 04/22/2025 09:03 AM]
April 20, 2025 Filing 9 DEFECTIVE---LETTER BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 10.] [Entered: 04/20/2025 03:28 PM] [Edited: 04/22/2025 09:03 AM]
April 18, 2025 Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA [Entered: 04/18/2025 09:45 AM]
April 2, 2025 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Reconsider Dispositive Order (DE 6) filed by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [COURT NOTE: No action necessary, no further filings order entered on 03/27/2025.] [Entered: 04/02/2025 03:19 PM] [Edited: 04/03/2025 10:01 AM]
March 27, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION to Reconsider Dispositive Order filed by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [Entered: 03/27/2025 04:48 PM]
March 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA) The notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after the district court entered the post-judgment order on October 29, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); Hollywood v. City of Santa Maria, 886 F.2d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir. 1989) (no separate judgment required for order denying post-judgment motion; time to appeal begins to run from entry of order denying post-judgment motion). This appeal is therefore dismissed. No further filings will be entertained in this case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/27/2025 11:37 AM]
March 14, 2025 Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Frederick David Pina is filed. [Entered: 03/14/2025 10:52 AM]
March 13, 2025 Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [Entered: 03/13/2025 04:22 PM]
March 12, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/21/2025. For appeal no. 25-1638, 2:24-cv-08704-MCS-SK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/12/2025 02:45 PM]
March 12, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-08704-MCS-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1638 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/12/2025 02:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FREDERICK DAVID PINA
Represented By: Mr. Frederick David Pina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?