Pina v. Tavelman
| FREDERICK DAVID PINA |
| FRANK M. TAVELMAN, Judge |
| 25-1687 |
| March 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MANDATE ISSUED Kim McLane WARDLAW, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE [Entered: 07/09/2025 09:13 AM] |
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. (Kim McLane WARDLAW, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE) After considering the response to the courts April 29, 2025 order and the opening brief, we deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 7) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 06/17/2025 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [Entered: 05/23/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Court Order filed by Appellant Frederick David Pina.[COURT ENTERED-Filing from DE#9] [Entered: 04/30/2025 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE---ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick David Pina.[Filed under wong event. Correct entry#10] [Entered: 04/29/2025 02:32 PM] [Edited: 04/30/2025 02:19 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 04/29/2025 11:49 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [Entered: 04/09/2025 05:53 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick David Pina. (Incorrect entry, see DE 7) [Entered: 04/09/2025 05:07 PM] [Edited: 04/11/2025 10:58 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. The fees for this appeal are overdue. Within 21 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve Form 4 on appellant. Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 4/30/2025 [Entered: 04/09/2025 02:27 PM]
|
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Frederick David Pina is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [Entered: 03/20/2025 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick David Pina. [Entered: 03/19/2025 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/23/2025. For appeal no. 25-1687, 2:25-cv-01439-MCS-SK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/14/2025 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01439-MCS-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1687 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/14/2025 08:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pina v. Tavelman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FREDERICK DAVID PINA | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Frederick David Pina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FRANK M. TAVELMAN, Judge | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
