Emrit v. Musk, et al.
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT, AKA: Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 |
| ELON MUSK, VIVEK RAMASWAMY, MIKE JOHNSON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY |
| 25-1707 |
| March 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA) This court has reviewed the March 7, 2025 notice of appeal and the district court record pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 15- 80221. The appeal lacks sufficient merit to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 25-1707 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Central District of California, constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/31/2025 01:03 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 25-1707. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number {15-80221}, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 03/14/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00372-CBM-RAO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1707 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/14/2025 03:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
