Harper v. City of Redlands, et al.
| JUSTIN CODY HARPER |
| CITY OF REDLANDS, Police Officer KOAHAU, an individual and official Capacity, REDLANDS POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOES, 1-10, inclusive |
| 25-1780 |
| March 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE (text only). On or before 10/10/2025, counsel are requested to contact the mediator by email to report on the status of the case. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The administrative closure period is extended until 10/17/2025. At any time before that date, any party may request that this appeal be reopened. [Entered: 09/08/2025 10:10 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The Clerk is directed to temporarily close this courts docket for administrative purposes until September 12, 2025. This administrative closure is not a decision on the merits and no mandate will issue in connection with this order. At any time, any party may request that this appeal be reopened. Counsel for all parties shall provide a status report by email to the Circuit Mediator ([email protected]), copied to all counsel, by September 5, 2025. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The status report should not be filed with the court. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. [Entered: 07/14/2025 11:47 AM]
|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Mediation Appellant Status Report due (Appellant) 7/8/2025, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/11/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/10/2025. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 06/20/2025 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Conference scheduled for 5/21/2025, is canceled. Mediation Appellant Status Report due (Appellant) 6/24/2025, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/28/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/27/2025. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 05/15/2025 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 5/21/2025, 1:30 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/27/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/28/2025, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/07/2025 03:39 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, even if the court has jurisdiction over appellant Koahaus appeal from the denial of summary judgment as to appellees federal claims, the parties must address whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal as to appellants City of Redlands and Redlands Police Department. See Horton by Horton v. City of Santa Maria, 915 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2019) ([M]unicipalities sued under 1983, unlike individuals, are not entitled to immunity, qualified or otherwise, and so, unlike individuals, can never be immune from trial. The denial of summary judgment to a municipal defendant on a Monell claim is therefore no different from the denial of any ordinary motion for summary judgment, and so is not immediately appealable.). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 03/20/2025 11:54 AM]
|
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/07/2025, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 03/19/2025 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant City of Redlands, Appellant Koahau. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/18/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/24/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/28/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/27/2025. For appeal no. 25-1780, 5:23-cv-00695-SSS-DTB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/18/2025 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:23-cv-00695-SSS-DTB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1780 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/18/2025 02:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
