Yahne v. United States Internal Revenue Service, et al.
| SCOTT GENE YAHNE |
| UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General and CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD |
| 25-1796 |
| March 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 3 Paper copies of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 18 by Appellee State of California Franchise Tax Board received. [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 20 6 Paper copies of Answering Brief submitted at DE 17 by Appellee State of California Franchise Tax Board received. [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:19 AM] |
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 17 by Appellee State of California Franchise Tax Board is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 18 by Appellee State of California Franchise Tax Board are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/28/2025 12:51 PM]
|
| Filing 18 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee State of California Franchise Tax Board. [Entered: 05/27/2025 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 17 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee State of California Franchise Tax Board. [Entered: 05/27/2025 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 16 3 Paper copies of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 12 by Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee David A. Hubbert received. [Entered: 05/27/2025 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 15 6 Paper copies of Answering Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee David A. Hubbert received. [Entered: 05/27/2025 12:08 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee David A. Hubbert is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 12 by Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee David A. Hubbert are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/22/2025 08:34 AM]
|
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Bruce R. Ellisen [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee David A. Hubbert. [Entered: 05/21/2025 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 11 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee David A. Hubbert. [Entered: 05/21/2025 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bruce R. Ellisen for Appellee David A. Hubbert, Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service. [Entered: 05/21/2025 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 9 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Scott Gene Yahne. [Entered: 04/02/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 TERMINATED participation of unregistered attorney Counsel for Appellee Halsey Jeannette Diakow, representing Appellee David A. Hubbert, Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service. Parties have alternate counsel. [Entered: 03/26/2025 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Richard L. Parker [Entered: 03/20/2025 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard L. Parker for Appellee David A. Hubbert, Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service. [Entered: 03/20/2025 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Scott Gene Yahne is filed. Original and 4 copies. [Entered: 03/19/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Scott Gene Yahne. [Entered: 03/19/2025 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/26/2025. For appeal no. 25-1796, 2:24-cv-02813-DJC-AC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/19/2025 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-02813-DJC-AC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1796 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/19/2025 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Scott Gene Yahne. [Entered: 03/20/2025 08:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
