Raiser v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego, et al.
| AARON RAISER |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, KAREN BERETSKY, SUSAN GELMIS, JOHN ROBERTS, Chief Justice, JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, DISTRICT JUDGE, USDC Judge, CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO, DISTRICT JUDGE, USDC Judge, ROBERT STEVEN HUIE, DISTRICT JUDGE, USDC Judge, BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, DISTRICT JUDGE, USDC Judge, DANA M. SABRAW, DISTRICT JUDGE, USDC Judge, CHARI L. BOWERY, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, ROBERT J. CONRAD, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE, Chief Judge, GONZALO P. CURIEL, DISTRICT JUDGE, USDC Judge, UNKNOWN PARTIES, All Non-Judicial Staff of CASD; Judge's Law Clerks, DOES 1-50, inclusive; in individual and official capacity, CHUCK ELLIS SCHUMER, SENATOR and MIKE JOHNSON, 56TH SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
| 25-1933 |
| March 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS This court has reviewed the March 19, 2025 notice of appeal and the district court record pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 14-80179. The appeal lacks sufficient merit to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 25-1933 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Southern District of California, constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/29/2025 02:25 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Court entered filing to correct DE 3] [Entered: 09/29/2025 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Aaron Raiser. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 4] [Entered: 09/29/2025 09:57 AM] [Edited: 09/29/2025 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 25-1933. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 14-80179, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct case numbers.] [Entered: 03/25/2025 01:43 PM] [Edited: 03/25/2025 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-01894-TWR-DDL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1933 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2025 01:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
