Thompson, et al. v. State of Montana, et al.
| PETER THOMPSON, NIKOLAIS THOMPSON and CATTAIL CREEK SUBDIVISION-PHASE II |
| STATE OF MONTANA, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, GREG GIANFORTE, AUCTION.COM LLC, CB PROPERTIES, LLC, JENNIFER MADGIC, City of Bozeman, City Commissioner, CITY OF BOZEMAN, CATTAIL CREEK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, JASON JAMES HENDERSON, ATTORNEY, BRAD J. CERTAIN, Manager of CB Properties LLC, THOMAS BOYCE, Manager of CB Properties LLC, CHUCK WINN, BEN ABBEY, JIM VELTKAMP, MARK CARPENTER, Bozeman Police Officer, SANDRA HAMILTON, ATTORNEY, DANIEL S. MADISON, ROB PERTZBORN, NEIL RAMHORST, AMY HANSON, KATHERINA FRECHE, JAYMIE LARSEN, At Your Service Cleaning & HOA Management Inc, WAYNE JENNINGS, SANDAN LLC, AT YOUR SERVICE CLEANING & HOA MANAGEMENT INC., INTRINSIK ARCHITECTURE, REGINA J. MCCLENDON, ATTORNEY, Locke Lord LLP (agent for US Bank), ELI PATTEN, Crowley Fleck PLLP (agent for CB Properties and CCCA Inc) and TERRY CUNNINGHAM, City of Bozeman, Mayor |
| 25-1948 |
| March 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH [Entered: 06/18/2025 09:49 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. (William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH) The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/27/2025 11:52 AM]
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) denied as unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Circuit Rule 27-11. [Entered: 04/29/2025 07:55 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Peter Thompson. [Entered: 04/28/2025 06:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 5) filed by Appellant Peter Thompson. [Entered: 04/28/2025 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee U.S. Bank National Association. [Entered: 04/17/2025 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee U.S. Bank National Association. [Entered: 04/11/2025 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant Peter Thompson. [Entered: 04/10/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/6/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/6/2025. For appeal no. 25-1948, 2:24-cv-00028-BMM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/25/2025 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-00028-BMM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1948 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2025 04:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.