Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
| TERENCE D. DAVIS |
| GENERAL ATOMICS, GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC., N/L BLUE, MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, PC, DANZIG, ROSENBERG SHPALL & ZEIGEN, APLC, a Professional Legal Corporation, CHARLOTTE ANN ENGSTROM, DAVID ROSENBERG, NEAL BLUE, DOES 1-50, inclusive, LINDEN BLUE, KERSTIN ANN-CHARLOTTE ENGSTROM, TOMAS SHPALL, ANNETTE FARNAES, PEARSE EARLY, DENNIS N. BRADY, STEFANO RIZNYK, SAN DIEGO EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP and SAN DIEGO BIZ LAW, APC |
| 25-1950 |
| March 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 MANDATE ISSUED William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH [Entered: 06/13/2025 08:44 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. (William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 11, 2025 order challenged in the notice of appeal is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/22/2025 11:55 AM]
|
| Filing 16 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Entered: 05/15/2025 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 15 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings. [Entered: 05/13/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellee General Atomics, Appellee General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., Appellee Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 13.] [Entered: 05/09/2025 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION for Summary Disposition or to Dismiss filed by Appellee General Atomics, Appellee General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., Appellee Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 14.] [Entered: 05/09/2025 02:12 PM] [Edited: 05/09/2025 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 12 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 05/05/2025 07:13 PM] |
| Filing 11 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Entered: 04/30/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee General Atomics. [Entered: 04/24/2025 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.. [Entered: 04/24/2025 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 6) filed by Appellee General Atomics, Appellee General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., Appellee Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC. [Entered: 04/24/2025 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Entered: 04/21/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellant Terence D. Davis. [Entered: 04/04/2025 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Terence D. Davis is filed. Original and 3 copies. [Entered: 04/02/2025 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Terence D. Davis. [Entered: 04/02/2025 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 03/31/2025 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/6/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/6/2025. For appeal no. 25-1950, 8:23-cv-00132-WLH-JDE. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/25/2025 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:23-cv-00132-WLH-JDE has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1950 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2025 04:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
