United States of America v. Redholtz
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| HERBERT REDHOLTZ and [email protected] |
| 25-1959 |
| March 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 30, 2025. The answering brief is due December 1, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 09/11/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Herbert Redholtz. [Entered: 09/08/2025 11:28 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. (TEXT ONLY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 15, 2025. The answering brief is due October 15, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/14/2025 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Herbert Redholtz. [Entered: 07/09/2025 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 8 SUBSTITUTED Chief, Criminal Appeals, US Attorneys Office, CDCA, for David Friedman. [Entered: 06/30/2025 05:04 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/17/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/18/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/17/2025 12:18 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Herbert Redholtz. [Entered: 06/17/2025 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 Criminal Appeals Questionnaire filed by Appellant Herbert Redholtz [Entered: 04/28/2025 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney James Anglin Flynn as Counsel for Appellant substituted for Attorney Anne O'Toole, Claire Marie Kennedy. [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Anglin Flynn for Appellant Herbert Redholtz replacing Anne O'Toole, Claire Marie Kennedy. [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: [151 Months]. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 4/8/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 5/8/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/17/2025. For appeal no. 25-1959, 2:22-cr-00433-MCS-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 03/26/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cr-00433-MCS-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1959 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/26/2025 08:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
