Anderson v. Royal, et al.
| ARNOLD ANDERSON |
| TERRY ROYAL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 25-2119 |
| April 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed. [25-430, 25-2119] [Entered: 07/10/2025 11:19 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Holly A. THOMAS, Roopali H. DESAI Appellant filed a petition for panel rehearing in Case No. 25-1363, but the filing is intended as a motion for reconsideration in closed Appeal Nos. 25-430 and 25-2119. The court has docketed the filing as a motion for reconsideration under the correct case numbers. The motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. 14 in Appeal No. 25-430; Docket Entry No. 4 in Appeal No. 25-2119) is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in these closed cases. [25-2119, 25-430] [Entered: 06/17/2025 12:23 PM]
|
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING filed by Appellant Arnold Anderson. [Entered: 05/30/2025 01:25 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Ryan D. NELSON, Patrick J. BUMATAY These appeals are from the denial of appellants 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition and subsequent post-judgment motion. The requests for a certificate of appealability are denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003); Martinez v. Shinn, 33 F.4th 1254, 1261 (9th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 584 (2023). All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED.[25-430, 25-2119] [Entered: 05/09/2025 03:55 PM]
|
| Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: [04/02/2025]. [Entered: 04/02/2025 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cv-00070-ART-CSD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2119 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/02/2025 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
