Bosse v. Ramirez, et al.
Petitioner: MICHAEL E. BOSSE
Respondent: Mr. RAMIREZ, Warden and IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
Case Number: 25-2169
Filed: April 3, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Johnnie B. RAWLINSON The motion (Docket Entry Nos. 15 & 17) for reconsideration is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. The motion (Docket Entry No. 16) to stay the mandate is unnecessary because no mandate issues after a certificate of appealability is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [Entered: 09/17/2025 03:58 PM]
September 15, 2025 Filing 18 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:50 PM]
August 27, 2025 Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Reconsider Dispositive Order (DE 15) filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 08/27/2025 01:40 PM]
August 21, 2025 Filing 16 MOTION to Stay Mandate filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 08/21/2025 12:36 PM]
August 19, 2025 Filing 15 MOTION to Reconsider Dispositive Order filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 08/19/2025 12:29 PM]
August 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Richard A. PAEZ, Milan D. SMITH, Jr. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 08/15/2025 09:11 AM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 13 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet per the request filed on 07/01/2025. [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:11 AM]
July 1, 2025 Filing 12 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 07/02/2025 08:53 AM]
May 29, 2025 Filing 11 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 05/29/2025 03:53 PM]
April 29, 2025 Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/29/2025 11:14 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/16/2025 09:01 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/16/2025 09:00 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/16/2025 08:58 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/16/2025 08:57 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 5 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 04/16/2025 08:55 AM]
April 14, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Release from Detention filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/14/2025 01:02 PM]
April 11, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Michael E. Bosse. [Entered: 04/11/2025 12:11 PM]
April 3, 2025 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/04/2025. [Entered: 04/03/2025 02:52 PM]
April 3, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:21-cv-00256-AKB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2169 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/03/2025 02:50 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bosse v. Ramirez, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL E. BOSSE
Represented By: Michael E. Bosse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mr. RAMIREZ, Warden
Represented By: Mr. L. LaMont Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?