Grizzly General Contractors Corp, et al. v. Kitsap Public Health District, et al.
Plaintiff: GRIZZLY GENERAL CONTRACTORS CORP, a Washington State corporation; DBA Grizzly Septic Services, WILLIAM GONZALES, a Washington State resident and STEPHANIE GONZALES, a Washington State resident
Defendant: KITSAP PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT, a Washington State accredited public health agency, ONLINE RME, LLC, a Washington State and Oregon State Limited Liability Company, E-ONSITE, LLC, a Washington State Limited Liability Company, ORENCO SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon for Profit Corporation and co-owner of Online RME LLC, ERIC EVANS, Individually and his marital community, Washington State residents and co-owners of Online RME LLC and Eonsite LLC, EDWIN NORTH, Individually and his marital community, Washington State residents and co-owners of Online RME LLC and Eonsite LLC, MIKE HARMON, Individually and his marital community, Washington State residents and co-owners of Online RME LLC, HAROLD BALL, Individually and his marital community, Oregon residents and co-owner of Orenco Systems Inc and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-50
Case Number: 25-2183
Filed: April 3, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 17, 2026 GRIZZLY GENERAL CONTRACTORS CORP, ET AL. V. KITSAP PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT, ET AL.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2025 Filing 34 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 24 by Appellee Online RME, LLC, Appellee E-Onsite, LLC, Appellee Eric Evans, Appellee Edwin North, Appellee Mike Harmon received. [Entered: 09/05/2025 04:02 PM]
September 5, 2025 Filing 33 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Appellee Online RME, LLC, Appellee E-Onsite, LLC, Appellee Eric Evans, Appellee Edwin North, Appellee Mike Harmon received. [Entered: 09/05/2025 03:58 PM]
August 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Appellees Online RME, LLC, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees Online RME, LLC, et al. must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 24 by Appellees Online RME, LLC, et al. are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees Online RME, LLC, et al. must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/29/2025 01:11 PM]
August 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 30) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 10/06/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/28/2025 04:38 PM]
August 28, 2025 Filing 30 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales. [Entered: 08/28/2025 04:30 PM]
August 27, 2025 Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Appellees Orenco Systems, Inc., et al received. [Entered: 08/27/2025 03:47 PM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 28 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellee Kitsap Public Health District received. [Entered: 08/22/2025 10:31 AM]
August 21, 2025 Filing 27 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Online RME, LLC, Appellee E-Onsite, LLC, Appellee Eric Evans, Appellee Edwin North, Appellee Mike Harmon. [Entered: 08/21/2025 12:19 PM]
August 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Appellees Orenco Systems, Inc., et al. is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees Orenco Systems, Inc., et al. must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/20/2025 11:40 AM]
August 19, 2025 Filing 25 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Orenco Systems, Inc., Appellee Harold Ball. [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:47 AM]
August 15, 2025 Filing 24 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Online RME, LLC, Appellee E-Onsite, LLC, Appellee Eric Evans, Appellee Edwin North, Appellee Mike Harmon.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 8/25/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 08/15/2025 04:36 PM] [Edited: 08/25/2025 02:20 PM]
August 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellee Kitsap Public Health District is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/15/2025 12:53 PM]
August 15, 2025 Filing 22 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Online RME, LLC, Appellee E-Onsite, LLC, Appellee Eric Evans, Appellee Edwin North, Appellee Mike Harmon.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 8/25/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 08/15/2025 12:52 PM] [Edited: 08/25/2025 02:18 PM]
August 14, 2025 Filing 21 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Kitsap Public Health District.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 8/15/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 08/14/2025 04:29 PM] [Edited: 08/15/2025 12:34 PM]
August 14, 2025 Filing 20 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Orenco Systems, Inc., Appellee Harold Ball.--[incorrct entry, correct entry at DE 19] [Entered: 08/14/2025 02:52 PM] [Edited: 08/20/2025 11:34 AM]
August 14, 2025 Filing 19 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Orenco Systems, Inc., Appellee Harold Ball.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 8/20/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 08/14/2025 02:42 PM] [Edited: 08/20/2025 11:33 AM]
July 14, 2025 Filing 18 3 Paper copies of Excerpts of Record in 3 Volume and Index Volume submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales received. [Entered: 07/14/2025 11:57 AM]
July 14, 2025 Filing 17 6 Paper copies of Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales received. [Entered: 07/14/2025 11:48 AM]
July 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 12) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 13) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule FOR ALL APPELLEES: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/15/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/02/2025 03:00 PM]
July 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellants is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellants must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 11 by Appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellants ust file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/02/2025 02:44 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 14 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Online RME, LLC, Appellee E-Onsite, LLC, Appellee Eric Evans, Appellee Edwin North, Appellee Mike Harmon. [Entered: 07/02/2025 01:45 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 13 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Orenco Systems, Inc., Appellee Harold Ball. [Entered: 07/02/2025 12:20 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 12 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Kitsap Public Health District. [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:54 AM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 7/2/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 06/30/2025 12:25 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 02:33 PM]
June 16, 2025 Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 7/2/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 06/16/2025 11:27 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 02:30 PM]
May 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/16/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/16/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/08/2025 04:11 PM]
May 8, 2025 Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales. [Entered: 05/08/2025 03:43 PM]
May 1, 2025 Filing 7 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 05/01/2025 10:53 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp. [Entered: 04/15/2025 10:33 AM]
April 14, 2025 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 5/1/2025, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time (originally 04/21/2025). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 04/14/2025 09:35 AM]
April 9, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 4/21/2025, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 04/09/2025 02:45 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Grizzly General Contractors Corp, Appellant William Gonzales, Appellant Stephanie Gonzales. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 04/07/2025 04:48 PM]
April 3, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/8/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/16/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-2183, 3:24-cv-05583-BHS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/03/2025 05:31 PM]
April 3, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-05583-BHS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2183 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/03/2025 05:28 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Grizzly General Contractors Corp, et al. v. Kitsap Public Health District, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GRIZZLY GENERAL CONTRACTORS CORP, a Washington State corporation; DBA Grizzly Septic Services
Represented By: Mr. Edward Charles Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM GONZALES, a Washington State resident
Represented By: Mr. Edward Charles Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE GONZALES, a Washington State resident
Represented By: Mr. Edward Charles Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KITSAP PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT, a Washington State accredited public health agency
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Kerley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ONLINE RME, LLC, a Washington State and Oregon State Limited Liability Company
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth Ainsworth
Represented By: Jack Michael Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E-ONSITE, LLC, a Washington State Limited Liability Company
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth Ainsworth
Represented By: Jack Michael Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ORENCO SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon for Profit Corporation and co-owner of Online RME LLC
Represented By: Ms. Megan Maria Coluccio
Represented By: Robert Christie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC EVANS, Individually and his marital community, Washington State residents and co-owners of Online RME LLC and Eonsite LLC
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth Ainsworth
Represented By: Jack Michael Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWIN NORTH, Individually and his marital community, Washington State residents and co-owners of Online RME LLC and Eonsite LLC
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth Ainsworth
Represented By: Jack Michael Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIKE HARMON, Individually and his marital community, Washington State residents and co-owners of Online RME LLC
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth Ainsworth
Represented By: Jack Michael Lovejoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAROLD BALL, Individually and his marital community, Oregon residents and co-owner of Orenco Systems Inc
Represented By: Ms. Megan Maria Coluccio
Represented By: Robert Christie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?