United States of America v. Houston
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOHN DOUGLAS HOUSTON |
| 25-2222 |
| April 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE [Entered: 07/21/2025 09:22 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE) Appellant challenges the district courts order authorizing his transfer to the Western District of Oklahoma. Because appellant has already been transferred, we cannot grant any effectual relief whatever in [his] favor. Calderon v. Moore, 518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996) (internal quotations omitted). The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to dismiss is therefore granted. DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/29/2025 10:26 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 4) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary because briefing is stayed pending resolution of appellee's motion (DE 3) to dismiss. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 05/20/2025 12:18 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant John Douglas Houston. [Entered: 05/20/2025 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 04/09/2025 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/19/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-2222, 3:25-mj-05045-DWC-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 04/07/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-mj-05045-DWC-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2222 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/07/2025 08:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Houston | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Zachary Wiley Dillon |
| Represented By: | Michael Symington Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOHN DOUGLAS HOUSTON | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Thomas Eugene Weaver, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
