Gelazela v. United States of America, et al.
Plaintiff: MARK ALAN GELAZELA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS MOORE, DOUGLAS WHITE, Warden, D. BOLCHER, C. LEPE, K. LEHMAN, OGADEN and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 25-2277
Filed: April 8, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 4, 2026 GELAZELA V. USA, ET AL.Fresno, Eastern CaliforniaPrisonerWardlaw, Kim McLane, Bade, Bridget S., Johnstone, Anthony D.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2025 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Mark A. Gelazela. (Incorrect entry, see DE 10) [Entered: 07/09/2025 03:40 PM] [Edited: 07/10/2025 03:15 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 12 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Mark A. Gelazela is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [Entered: 07/02/2025 03:29 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 11 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Mark A. Gelazela. (Incorrect entry, see DE 10) [Entered: 07/02/2025 11:01 AM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 03:28 PM]
July 2, 2025 Filing 10 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Mark A. Gelazela.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached index of exhibits]--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF of index attached as of 7/10/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 07/02/2025 12:18 AM] [Edited: 07/10/2025 03:13 PM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 9 3 Paper copies of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 6 by Appellee United States of America, Appellee Thomas Moore received. [Entered: 06/30/2025 10:37 AM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 8 6 Paper copies of Answering Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellee United States of America, Appellee Thomas Moore received. [Entered: 06/30/2025 10:33 AM]
June 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellees United States of America and Thomas Moore is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 6 by Appellees United States of America and Thomas Moore are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/25/2025 09:57 AM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 6 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America, Appellee Thomas Moore.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 6/25/2025, REPLACING original attachments] [Entered: 06/20/2025 04:46 PM] [Edited: 06/25/2025 09:44 AM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 5 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America, Appellee Thomas Moore.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 6/25/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 06/20/2025 04:42 PM] [Edited: 06/25/2025 09:43 AM]
April 21, 2025 Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Mark A. Gelazela is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [Entered: 04/21/2025 01:26 PM]
April 18, 2025 Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Mark A. Gelazela. [Entered: 04/18/2025 09:33 PM]
April 8, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/20/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/20/2025. For appeal no. 25-2277, 1:21-cv-01499-JLT-EPG. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/08/2025 03:21 PM]
April 8, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:21-cv-01499-JLT-EPG has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2277 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/08/2025 03:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gelazela v. United States of America, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Benjamin Eli Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS MOORE
Represented By: Benjamin Eli Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOUGLAS WHITE, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. BOLCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. LEPE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. LEHMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OGADEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK ALAN GELAZELA
Represented By: Mark Alan Gelazela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?