Canul-Mukul v. Bondi
| LUIS CANUL-MUKUL |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 25-2281 |
| April 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Monday, December 1, 2025 - 10:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [25-2281] [Entered: 09/21/2025 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Frank E. Ronzio. [Entered: 09/15/2025 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for December 2025 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [25-2281] [Entered: 09/11/2025 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 14 by Respondent Pamela Bondi received. [Entered: 08/01/2025 01:18 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 14 by Respondent Pamela Bondi is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/24/2025 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 14 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 07/24/2025 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 13 Attorney Timothy G. Hayes as Counsel for Respondent substituted for Attorney M. Samer Budeir. [Entered: 07/10/2025 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Timothy G. Hayes for Respondent Pamela Bondi replacing M. Samer Budeir. [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 11 6 Paper copies of Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Petitioner Luis Canul-Mukul received. [Entered: 06/20/2025 10:31 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Petitioner Luis Canul-Mukul is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/16/2025 02:40 PM]
|
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Luis Canul-Mukul. [Entered: 06/16/2025 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 06/09/2025 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/23/2025 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent M. Samer Budeir [Entered: 04/09/2025 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by M. Samer Budeir for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 04/09/2025 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 5/19/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 6/9/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 6/30/2025, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 7/28/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 04/09/2025 07:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/8/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2281 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/09/2025 07:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/09/2025 07:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Luis Canul-Mukul. [Entered: 04/09/2025 07:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Canul-Mukul v. Bondi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LUIS CANUL-MUKUL | |
| Represented By: | Frank E. Ronzio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. M. Samer Budeir |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. Timothy G. Hayes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
