National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, et al. v. Bonta
Plaintiff: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, on behalf of Itself and Its Members and SCV PREGNANCY CENTER
Defendant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 25-2287
Filed: April 9, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2025 Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/14/2025, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/7/2025, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/4/2025. For appeal no. 25-2287, 2:24-cv-08468-HDV-MAR.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/09/2025 12:01 PM]
April 9, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-08468-HDV-MAR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2287 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/09/2025 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, et al. v. Bonta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, on behalf of Itself and Its Members
Represented By: Jonathan Caleb Dalton
Represented By: Mr. Erik Baptist
Represented By: Mr. Lincoln Davis Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SCV PREGNANCY CENTER
Represented By: Jonathan Caleb Dalton
Represented By: Mr. Erik Baptist
Represented By: Mr. Lincoln Davis Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Represented By: Ms. Hayley Frances Penan
Represented By: Ms. Kathleen Boergers
Represented By: Ms. Karli A. Eisenberg
Represented By: Erica Madeline Connolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?