Lee v. City of San Jose, et al.
Plaintiff: JIMMY KIT LEE
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE and MICHAEL ROBERSON
Case Number: 25-2372
Filed: April 14, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2025 Filing 20 PHYSICAL EXHIBITS (4 copies) filed by Appellees: video exhibits on USB drive. [Entered: 08/22/2025 12:49 PM]
August 18, 2025 Filing 19 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for leave to transmit exhibits is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 27-14. Counsel must submit 4 copies of the exhibits within 7 days of this order. [Entered: 08/18/2025 04:50 PM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellees City of San Jose and Michael Roberson [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:09 PM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 17 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 11 by Appellees City of San Jose and Michael Roberson received. [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:07 PM]
July 25, 2025 Filing 16 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 13 by Appellant Jimmy Kit Lee is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/25/2025 10:28 AM]
July 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellees City of San Jose and Michael Roberson is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 11 by Appellees City of San Jose and Michael Roberson are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/25/2025 10:27 AM]
July 24, 2025 Filing 14 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee Michael Roberson. (Duplicate entry, correct entry at DE 10) [Entered: 07/24/2025 03:12 PM] [Edited: 07/25/2025 10:16 AM]
July 23, 2025 Filing 13 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Jimmy Kit Lee. [Entered: 07/23/2025 11:57 PM]
July 23, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee Michael Roberson. [Entered: 07/23/2025 05:13 PM]
July 23, 2025 Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee Michael Roberson. [Entered: 07/23/2025 05:02 PM]
July 23, 2025 Filing 10 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee Michael Roberson.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 7/25/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 07/23/2025 05:00 PM] [Edited: 07/25/2025 10:15 AM]
June 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/23/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/20/2025 03:50 PM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee Michael Roberson. [Entered: 06/20/2025 01:43 PM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Malgorzata Laskowska [Entered: 06/20/2025 11:59 AM]
June 20, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Malgorzata Laskowska for Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee Michael Roberson. [Entered: 06/20/2025 10:34 AM]
May 15, 2025 Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 and Excerpts of Record in 5 Volumes submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Jimmy Kit Lee are filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [Entered: 05/15/2025 11:14 AM]
May 12, 2025 Filing 4 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Jimmy Kit Lee.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF files attached as of 5/15/2025, REPLACING original attachments] [Entered: 05/12/2025 08:38 PM] [Edited: 05/15/2025 11:07 AM]
May 12, 2025 Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Jimmy Kit Lee.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF of brief attached as of 5/15/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 05/12/2025 08:24 PM] [Edited: 05/15/2025 11:00 AM]
April 14, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/27/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/23/2025. For appeal no. 25-2372, 5:23-cv-00778-NW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/14/2025 01:09 PM]
April 14, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:23-cv-00778-NW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2372 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/14/2025 01:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lee v. City of San Jose, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF SAN JOSE
Represented By: Mr. Wesley Martin Klimczak
Represented By: Maren Clouse
Represented By: Malgorzata Laskowska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL ROBERSON
Represented By: Mr. Wesley Martin Klimczak
Represented By: Maren Clouse
Represented By: Malgorzata Laskowska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JIMMY KIT LEE
Represented By: Mr. Jimmy Kit Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?