Biden v. Ziegler, et al.
Plaintiff: ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN, an individual
Defendant: ICU, LLC, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company doing business as Marco Polo and GARRETT ZIEGLER, an individual
Case Number: 25-2407
Filed: April 15, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2025 Filing 26 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Appellee Robert Hunter Biden received. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/24/2025 10:36 AM]
September 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Appellee Robert Hunter Biden is filed. Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/22/2025 03:23 PM]
September 22, 2025 Filing 24 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Robert Hunter Biden. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/22/2025 09:22 AM]
September 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. The motions (Docket Entry Nos. 21 & 22) for an extension of time to file paper copies of the opening brief and excerpts of record are granted. The paper copies have been received. The consolidated answering brief remains due September 22, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/08/2025 01:39 PM]
September 8, 2025 Filing 22 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 15 by Appellant Garrett Ziegler received. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/08/2025 10:44 AM]
September 8, 2025 Filing 21 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Appellant Garrett Ziegler received. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/08/2025 10:38 AM]
September 4, 2025 Filing 20 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Filed multiple times] [Entered: 09/04/2025 08:12 PM] [Edited: 09/05/2025 11:43 AM]
September 4, 2025 Filing 19 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412][Filed multiple times] [Entered: 09/04/2025 08:10 PM] [Edited: 09/05/2025 11:39 AM]
September 4, 2025 Filing 18 MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellant ICU, LLC. [25-2412, 25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408] [Entered: 09/04/2025 08:07 PM]
September 4, 2025 Filing 17 MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [25-2407, 25-2406, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 09/04/2025 08:04 PM]
August 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Appellant Garrett Ziegler is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 19 by Appellant Garrett Ziegler are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 08/25/2025 09:31 AM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 15 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 08/22/2025 11:56 PM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 08/22/2025 11:51 PM]
July 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. The motions (Docket Entry No. 11 in 25-2406, Docket Entry No. 7 in 25-2407, Docket Entry No. 7 in 25-2408, Docket Entry No. 7 in 25-2412) to dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction are denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief. See Natl Indus. v. Republic Natl Life Ins. Co., 677 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1982) (merits panel may consider appellate jurisdiction despite earlier denial of motion to dismiss). The motions (Docket Entry No. 14 in 25-2406, Docket Entry No. 10 in 25-2407, Docket Entry No. 10 in 25-2408, Docket Entry No. 11 in 25-2412) toconsolidate are granted. Appeal Nos. 25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, and 25-2412 are consolidated. The consolidated opening brief is due August 22, 2025. The consolidated answering brief is due September 22, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after the consolidated answering brief is served. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 07/18/2025 10:00 AM]
May 21, 2025 Filing 12 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:34 AM]
May 13, 2025 Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 10) filed by Appellee Robert Hunter Biden. [Entered: 05/13/2025 09:31 AM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 7) filed by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [Entered: 05/06/2025 06:17 PM]
May 4, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE of Transcript Designation filed by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. [Entered: 05/04/2025 10:26 PM]
May 1, 2025 Filing 8 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 05/01/2025 09:40 AM]
April 28, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Robert Hunter Biden. [Entered: 04/28/2025 03:25 PM]
April 28, 2025 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Zachary Hansen [Entered: 04/28/2025 07:47 AM]
April 25, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Zachary Hansen for Appellee Robert Hunter Biden. [Entered: 04/25/2025 05:15 PM]
April 25, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER: By 5/9/2025, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [25-2406, 25-2407, 25-2408, 25-2412] [Entered: 04/25/2025 11:35 AM]
April 21, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Garrett Ziegler. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 04/21/2025 10:08 PM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/21/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 4/28/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 5/28/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/7/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/6/2025. For appeal no. 25-2407, 2:23-cv-07593-HDV-KS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:12 AM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-07593-HDV-KS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2407 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Biden v. Ziegler, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN, an individual
Represented By: Mr. Bryan Sullivan
Represented By: Abbe David Lowell
Represented By: Zachary Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ICU, LLC, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company doing business as Marco Polo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GARRETT ZIEGLER, an individual
Represented By: Jennifer Holliday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?